Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Lacey Dyno Updated 4/11/09!

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 37
2008-03-20 19:51:51
#11
Originally Posted by Teal97
205/150 on a dyno dynamics dyno? (i couldn't resist)
me thinks more like ~175/135.
pp maybe~7800rpm
once it's tuned, i'll take it back to the dynojet 248 i've used in the past for a comparison.


oops. eff me for reading too quick. good luck.
2008-03-23 04:16:13
#12
Looks like I'll be able to make it! If you get a chance, could you post up an address to the dyno shop so I can mapquest it.

-Bryan
2008-03-23 22:46:50
#13
here it is Bryan.
horsepowerconnection.com
3939 12th ave, bldg 2, unit c
Lacey, Wa. 98503
360-455-7252
the bldg is a bit tricky to find. the last street you turn on to is a more like an ally, iirc. i'll be there~9:55am
checkout the website...the owner (Brian Macy) has done some pretty wild (1000+hp) stuff!
see you there
2008-03-28 02:30:51
#14
and the survey says.................
Originally Posted by Benito
oops. eff me for reading too quick. good luck.


Welp Ben..........................i apologize:o

you were very damn close! i was way the f*&k off!
first let me say it was definitely a learning experience. over 4 hours on the rack, tweaking this and that. we added timing AND fuel to the top end of the stock maps. we also played with volumetric efficiency (VE) and some other parameters (a fairly computer literate car geek should be able to do this). to make things much faster though, some sort of rt logging software should be utilized.
now to the results. we hit a best of 209.8/159.0. after further tuning for driveability we dipped into the 206whp range. we ended up with 208.2/157.5. power peaked @~7400rpm and was pretty close to that from 6800-7800. torque peak was @~4200rpm (the infamous cai bump). it was otherwise very linear, being above 150ftlb from 3k to 7k. before anyone asks.....NO! we were NOT in shootout mode.
i'll be returning to intec racing's dynojet 248 for a couple comparison pulls for sh!ts & giggles. tomorrow, i'll post todays charts.
thanks for reading and,
Good night
2008-03-28 06:10:19
#15
Well good **** man! eff me for acquiescing. But then I'm the only other one with a prediction so I'm still closest.


Post up some charts.
2008-03-28 14:20:54
#16
here's my pretty much typical looking n/a VE chart for your viewing pleasure. all runs were made through the stock (nearly 200k miles) cat.



and a pretty ragged looking afr chart. afr's were taken @ the tailpipe

2008-03-28 15:06:07
#17
Wow those are great numbers, im jealous. I need some pointers for my VE E model lol. Hope to see you out at Golden Gardens!
2008-03-28 16:16:26
#18
Originally Posted by Teal97
here's my pretty much typical looking n/a VE chart for your viewing pleasure. all runs were made through the stock (nearly 200k miles) cat.


Beautiful, love that torque curve, or should I say torque flat line. Nice work Ric. Care to share any of the timing figures?
2008-03-28 17:24:31
#19
Timing!
1st we did a couple base pulls to see what the afr's were looking like. holy crap this frugger was pretty lean up top. so we commenced to dick with that for a while (lowering the cell values in that region). we also found that lowering the ve table values helped even more.
then it was on to the timing tables.
i'm sure you guy's have heard it before. Timing! the ve loves timing, and lots of it. we added anywhere from 4-7* to the stock ve curve above ~6k and added 2-3* to some lower cells just to smoothen the transition. we didn't screw with the cam switch points at all. still @ 5kin/5.6kex.
we were seeing 4.73v on the ve maf so we played with the maf table a little, but ended up putting it back to normal.
the last time i saw these kind of numbers from my ve was last year when we were testing the headers Charles was building. if you guys remember, the Chuck header smashed the fuji #'s throughout the midrange and at the top end. and that was on the dynojet.
soooooo. put this altogether and i see a very real possibility of ~220whp/165tq with only bolt-ons.
now who's gonna man up? (taking donations)
2008-03-28 18:06:45
#20
Originally Posted by Teal97
1st we did a couple base pulls to see what the afr's were looking like. holy crap this frugger was pretty lean up top. so we commenced to dick with that for a while (lowering the cell values in that region). we also found that lowering the ve table values helped even more.
then it was on to the timing tables.
i'm sure you guy's have heard it before. Timing! the ve loves timing, and lots of it. we added anywhere from 4-7* to the stock ve curve above ~6k and added 2-3* to some lower cells just to smoothen the transition. we didn't screw with the cam switch points at all. still @ 5kin/5.6kex.
we were seeing 4.73v on the ve maf so we played with the maf table a little, but ended up putting it back to normal.
the last time i saw these kind of numbers from my ve was last year when we were testing the headers Charles was building. if you guys remember, the Chuck header smashed the fuji #'s throughout the midrange and at the top end. and that was on the dynojet.
soooooo. put this altogether and i see a very real possibility of ~220whp/165tq with only bolt-ons.
now who's gonna man up? (taking donations)


Give me a little bit there rick and I'll be there to man up Great numbers though! Good to see high numbers from an all-motor car.

Chris
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top