Thread: n1 cam results

I would change back to the stock settings. Those cams have so much overlap you have so very very little to gain by adding more. Switch them back to 0, 0 and I bet you will make more power.

haha thanks, expected 20-30hp more.

full mod list:

xforce 4>2>1 headers
2.5" exhaust and high flow cat, 2 resonators and 2.25" muffler
pod filter
nistune daughterboard




was considering this when I had them installed too
might have to get them to swing them to 0-0 and see what difference it makes. First i've heard of that on here though.

well results are in, and on target!
looks like the other workshop had buggered up the cam gears. Properly set to 2.5 intake/exhaust and this result:
This is overlayed with the stock 20ve cams.

You need to address that dip in HP/TQ around 5,500RPM.
I'm GUESSING your VVL is activating too late, try activation at 5,100RPM.

that 2.25" muffler is clogging things up too. I would run 2.5" all the way back if I were running a stock SR20VE or one with SR16VE cams, but with N1's, I'd go 3".

from what i was told from my local tuner is the dyno dynamics can read up to 17 to 18% difference from the mustang or the other dynos, most of the time people are dissapointed with the results of the dyno dynamics beucase they read lower.... with the dyno dynamics tey can dial in the simlation of the mustang or other dynos to get their result....but alot of the times the other dynos overshoot the numbers thats why they like those particular numbers they see...dynos are mearly a tuning tool to get the car running right and running optimal..i wouldnt be upset with the numbers really

http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e39-m5-e52-z8-discussion/95056-interesting-dyno-factoids-dyno-dynamics-mustang-dynojet.html read up

yes i believe this to be true also, here in aus we only really have dynodynamics (99%) and the occasional mainline (which is the bomb apparently) and dynopak

when i fist jumped on this site i was like wtf these people are simply achieving the unachievable.

i clicked on your link and the rough guide of dynomatics to dynojet (ddx1.18=dj) seems about right. therefore our 300rwkw's (which is what i would like to get) is roughly equal to dynojet 475hp. this all seams about right. The reason the dd reads lower is because it loads the car up better, inturn resulting in lower numbers but better tune as the load is more realistic to a car does on the streets. This is my understanding of it anyway

in saying this each dyno can be calibrated differently and there are the typically happy dyno's in any brand i suppose. (with maybe the exception of mainline which is considered the unfudgeable dyno)


also i saw a pic of a dyno jet.....wtf its just a single roller, big power cars would really wanna jump off would they?

the low reading with the DD originally has nothing to do with it.
I took it straight across to my normal dyno (the hub one above) and it pulled the same figures as with the std cams in it.
The people who originally installed the cams did it wrong, as evidenced by the increases above.