Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: 2.3L VE Motors Build For Cheap With Mazworx Headgasket

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 121-130 of 346
2009-03-30 21:34:32
#121
Originally Posted by donttazmebro
lol, ricer math


Hey, I don't like bench racing any more than you do... but when you are weighing options sometimes you have to.
2009-03-30 21:45:00
#122
Originally Posted by Taiden
Hey, I don't like bench racing any more than you do... but when you are weighing options sometimes you have to.


you are assuming the head, intake, header, and engine management will all magically come together and you will make 250whp.

It's not going to happen, well it's not going to happen on pump gas for cheap anyway...
2009-03-30 21:54:23
#123
Originally Posted by Taiden
So on a 210 whp / 151 wtq would put you around 241 whp / 173 wtq across the entire range?

So basically this setup bored will get you those numbers.

Since we are replacing the pistons why don't we bump the compression while we are at it?

Stock VE compression is 10.3:1, so if you bumped it to 12:1 compression that would be another 6.3% on top of that... (Calculations) making it 256 whp and 184 wtq.

Lol, those numbers just sound ridiculous. ITBs on top of that and 9000 rpm?

I guess that's how miko got his approximately 250 whp measurement.

Of course, we will also have a 21.3% increase in gas mileage, right? RIGHT?


Increase displacement and you increase the amount of torque throretically proportionally. If your intake flow limits you to say 220whp then you will not make anymore than 220whp when related to flow. Bumping compression from 10.3:1 to 12:1 will not give you a 6.3% increase in power. maybe 5-6whp tops if tuned well. Bumping compression should give you a % power (torque) increase everywhere.

If you take Andreas' 216whp 160 tq 2.0L setup and add 15% displacement to the mix, it should THEORETICALLY make 248whp, 184tq just from 15%more displacement. That is assuming you keep your airflow to displacement ratio constant aas well as header design.
2009-03-30 22:20:16
#124
so what your saying is ve's are held back by the design or ineffiency of the intake manifold, be it a stock ve mani or a n1 mani.

whats the max whp a stock ve or n1 mani can can supply ?

if im reading what youve been saying in various threads correctly, 230-250whp can not be a reality with out a custom intake mani. wich as well all know none are avaliable or even produced.

stratton.
2009-03-31 05:38:50
#125
Originally Posted by STRATTON
so what your saying is ve's are held back by the design or ineffiency of the intake manifold, be it a stock ve mani or a n1 mani.

whats the max whp a stock ve or n1 mani can can supply ?

if im reading what youve been saying in various threads correctly, 230-250whp can not be a reality with out a custom intake mani. wich as well all know none are avaliable or even produced.

stratton.


The N1 intake manifold has better flow abilities as well as atomization than the standard intake manifold. They both lack enough combined flow for much power over 200whp (SAE Give or take).

Sure you can increase the compression, reduce friction, increase thermaldynamic efficiency and make a lot more power, but when it comes to making power from volumetric efficiency, then yes, the Intake manifold seems to be the factor that will continue to hold back these motors.

With all that said, If you can not make more power much easier by reving the motor higher because of intake flow restriction, then just add displacement.

After the 20v/N1 cams get developed and produced, I will be working on a permanent Intake manifold solution. I have the ability to get a few welded prototypes made and then get molds made and possibly start casting these intakes.... All in due time though. There is only 2 of us and I can only do so much.
2009-03-31 15:30:22
#126
Originally Posted by snickers
The N1 intake manifold has better flow abilities as well as atomization than the standard intake manifold. They both lack enough combined flow for much power over 200whp (SAE Give or take).

Sure you can increase the compression, reduce friction, increase thermaldynamic efficiency and make a lot more power, but when it comes to making power from volumetric efficiency, then yes, the Intake manifold seems to be the factor that will continue to hold back these motors.

With all that said, If you can not make more power much easier by reving the motor higher because of intake flow restriction, then just add displacement.

After the 20v/N1 cams get developed and produced, I will be working on a permanent Intake manifold solution. I have the ability to get a few welded prototypes made and then get molds made and possibly start casting these intakes.... All in due time though. There is only 2 of us and I can only do so much.


What about sport bike ITBs mated to oem runners + speed density.
2009-03-31 15:39:04
#127
Originally Posted by Taiden
What about sport bike ITBs mated to oem runners + speed density.


I have seen people do the sport bike ITB's and made them work. The biggest problem will be getting the bore centerline from the intake flange of our motors to line up with the bike ITB's. the ZX14R ones would be the best or a set or 2 from a ducati....
2009-03-31 19:24:15
#128
Originally Posted by Taiden
What about sport bike ITBs mated to oem runners + speed density.


A well made intake manifold will be just as good if not better than itb's
2009-03-31 19:53:19
#129
Originally Posted by kesi24
A well made intake manifold will be just as good if not better than itb's


Even if this is true (and I have no idea if it is), we're in a budget setup thread so I considered a fully custom intake mani not-an-option.
2009-03-31 19:56:31
#130
Originally Posted by STRATTON
if im reading what youve been saying in various threads correctly, 230-250whp can not be a reality with out a custom intake mani. wich as well all know none are avaliable or even produced.

stratton.


A Ve can make 230+ on stock n1 manifold but its starving for air as pointed out by snickers.Most people will never make that power anyways . As for intake manifolds you could of used an o2 intake when they made it, if you knew the correct spec's or you can always get an n1 ported from snickers he always have great products.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top