Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: ve vs de power delivery

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 51-60 of 77
2008-07-11 16:29:51
#51
Originally Posted by FORZWIN
How is the gearing on the sr16 trans? Is it really at 5k around 70mph?


no

70mph is under 4k rpm...i know because im running one
2008-07-11 16:32:32
#52
the previous owner of my car ran a stock VE and beat it. i have a mild set up. stock ve's can only go so far and also lack of tuning running against DE's with some work. can't really complain. i'd be happy if i had a stock ve and a modded DE barely beat me. stock for stock obviously no comparison.
2008-07-11 16:36:02
#53
Originally Posted by SeR
heres an example i found the other day..supposedly the black 1 is a DE and the VE is in the camera car which is also a B13

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=946uYDz8hJw


for one, learn to race. you can hear he was at way too low of an RPM. VE's need to be on the engage ment if not right before it to run right. also looked like it was dieing top end even though it was catching up. and camera does suck.
2008-07-11 18:32:27
#54
Great VE vs DE "Thread"
I pretty much just read this whole thread and I think this is a good thread. I think driving and tuning or two of the main focus points here. It's a VE in a B13 vs a DE in a B13. I would assume that the weight of the cars would be about the same. With that being said, a fully bolted/built DE vs a stock VE shouldn't be night and day in my opinion. I know there is more to factor in. I'm just using this as my personal example.

Originally Posted by gEE805
sounds like your guys ve suck... cause even with the de having bolt on cant compete with ves ...inless someoe like that one guy tunes ur de's with aem ems. lol then i'd be concern but this thread seems useless lol


^That would be BenFenner and this thread is not useless

Originally Posted by RaggaMuffin
My stock sr20ve with no VVL activation was beating sr20de's when i first did the swap.

This thread is a joke.


^How do you figure? Even Mike K. wasn't that impressed with the VE over the DE when he first tested it out. If I'm wrong on this statement, somebody correct me now.

Originally Posted by Kundara88
Umm.....he was talking about lower power DE's having the edge on the roads better than VEs, and from my experience I agree with him..so if you dont get the point of my post...I was trying to find out the anwers also.

I was comparing a DE'd b13 and a VE'd b13.

I think you need to reread MY post. you read MY post wrong.


^owned him..........on the come back post

Originally Posted by snj2245
point being.... this thread was about b13's that weigh the same

the rest however doesn't make sense, except that u have a stock ve vs a built de
my guess would be that the de just has more torque around corners .... sides that i donno maybe the ve isn't making the power it should for some reason, but the power difference between a ve and de should be night and day


^I agree with you until the night and day comment. I don't think it would be that big of a difference. Bold blue - Would be a good run. Night and Day? I don't think so.


Originally Posted by Doctor
I think some fo you guys are really missing the point. The area under the curve and the time it takes to reach peak hp is more important than the numbers themselves. This is where the cammed out DE's are getting their edge from.

Take a stock cam DE and a DE with aftermarket cams. The aftermarket one may only make around 10whp more peak, but the way it revs and the way the power curve is moved makes it alot quicker than the stock cammed DE.

Do a search for some ve vs de vid on you tube. Often you can't tell which is which...

Ultimately I'm still a ve guy as I think they have more potential in the end. But this thread focusses on stock-sih ve vs worked de's where the ve has more peak hp than the de.


^Good post + rep

Originally Posted by nissan
.....it has got to be in the tunning , so much more time has been spent tunning the De , vs. the time that has been spent on the VE ....but there is that old saying power is not everything



^Good post + rep

Originally Posted by llaprad1
I'd bet its everyone whose got cobbled-together VEs, running mismatched ECU/MAF/AFC and whatever OBX header they can dig up.

I have intake, Fuji VE header, and JWT ecu, and I've beaten M3s, S2000s and 350Zs at the 1/8th strip.


^I can't say anything against your setup Louis. I saw your car in person. Your setup is nice. So if I've said anything out of line, put me in my place.

Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
both de and ve have their potentials, there are alot of variables such as, bolt on, i any tuning is done, driver skills, weigh of driver, weight of car...alot of things to take into consideration when saying one engine could out power another


^Good post + rep
2008-07-11 18:57:58
#55
I guess its initially a more subtle difference than, say a DET vs a DE. But after you get used to the exhaust cam kicking in, it starts to feel like a night and day difference.

Plus my VE never lets up right until my tach says 8k rpm. It feels like it could go more. The DE tends to lose power right before its own redline.

My setup is basic..I/H and 2.5 exhaust. But its also optimal, nice VE-specific tune, VE-specific exhaust ports.

But I will go back and say any kind of comparison on the street is kind of weak and misleading. And that video isn't worth much debate.

I will say that my Rallycross DE is as fun as hell, and I'm sporting a blown OEM suspension on it. So yeah, power is not everything!
2008-07-11 19:27:21
#56
Originally Posted by donttazmebro
...70mph is under 4k rpm...i know because im running one


Thanks, that sounds a lot better.




Originally Posted by llaprad1
I guess its initially a more subtle difference than, say a DET vs a DE. But after you get used to the exhaust cam kicking in, it starts to feel like a night and day difference.

Plus my VE never lets up right until my tach says 8k rpm. It feels like it could go more. The DE tends to lose power right before its own redline...

...But I will go back and say any kind of comparison on the street is kind of weak and misleading. And that video isn't worth much debate...


I agree that at first it doesn't feel like that big of a difference, until you go without it. A friend of mine was amazed at the difference between the two on his first ride last night. Consequently I drove his DE last night and you can just feel that it's not making the same power, while minimal in the low end, it really stands out up top. He's running a basic setup with a HS gen4, WAI, and a 2.5in exhaust no cat, which gives him the nudge in the mods category.

I would like to see if I can get another local DE guy to do a side by side pull from 2nd to 4th (shutting down as you hit 4th). My VE is probably one of the lower performers, as such it should be a decent comparisson against a Bolt on DE.

I think in the end, if your goals are a modest N/A 170whp, there is really no appeal to the VE, sure it's a great setup, but a cam'd DE is no slouch and can be just as rewarding at those power levels. Not to mention you can make that much on the DE with less money invested. That being said, the VVL is addicting, even at ~170whp, and the potential for 200whp+ is always tempting.
2008-07-12 03:25:14
#57
I guess I would be a good person to chime in here. I have had a DE setup about everyway possible. With just about every cam combination and I will say. A DE full bolted DOES NOT COMPARE to a VE with a header and exhaust. I dont care what you tune or what you do! The only people that argue this are people that havent had side by side comparisons. Just for a good comparison my buddy has a 35 shot on his s4d DE. We race and I beat him by like a car. I think it was Dre that I talked to that told me he beat a fully bolted de with a 75 shot.

The DE is old and a great motor. The VE is better all around. Power, gas mileage, price.
A fully bolted DE will cost you more than a VE. The VE will make more power with less time. There is nothing to prove with the DE motor.
2008-07-12 03:59:33
#58
^^^ Well said... I have my S3 DE in the 91 and it's not too shabby with my basic mods. On the other hand the VE w/N1s and full bolt ons runs like a raped ape to 8K with a 2.5" mandrel exhaust. Time to go to a 3" and try to find a quiet muffler so the cops don't get upset when they hear me drive by. 200whp and pass AZ emissions while running high 13s with full interior and AC will work for me. The daily 91 has great midrange but peters out at around 7K with the S3s. It's still a very fun car to drive but IMHO the VE has much more potential for power under the curve and high end. I hardly engage VVL when I drive the 94 because of the available abundance of torque at 2.5 to 5k which makes it so easy to drive.
2008-07-12 12:43:52
#59
^^^ My fried you are 100% right. I also have a 94 SER with the VE. Post some pics up of yours what color is it?
2008-07-12 15:15:42
#60
Originally Posted by nissansr20nx
^^^ My fried you are 100% right. I also have a 94 SER with the VE. Post some pics up of yours what color is it?


Make another thread if your gonna ask questions like that. Stay on topic.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top