Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: New peak WHP with different mods

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 42
2014-07-08 18:45:54
#21
How am I taking anything personally from my comments above? No one else could draw that conclusion, Jordan.

All my comments are what this forum knows from your posts, and they are collated together in an easily digestible format. In one post in this very thread, you said you will not alter the MSD point. Just today, you said you would, and now most recently you said you will not change it. That's fine you get upset by my comments, I don't mean to, these are simple observations based upon history.

The magic is from the PERSON, not the hardware. Jamie and John are great, they are mother-fucking BOSSES at their craft. I dealt with JWT enough and they can suck a dong. They don't even cater to us anymore since the precious V6 guys will toss loot out at them hand over fist.

I dislike watching people break engines or ruin their cars for whatever reason. They were engineered to live, thrive, drive, etc.... These cars will survive because of people like myself that want to restore and keep the cars going.

Take it from my Father's point of view, Keep these cars! If you really like a car (or anything), no price will come between them and the owner. There will only be less cars, not more.

P.S. JWT messed up there little sticker for my car and had me dumping excess fuel into my cylinder for five weeks before I gave them the chip code and then they "noticed" no one had made me aware of the 25* base idle ignition timing the ECU needed.
Last edited by Kyle on 2014-07-08 at 18-49-10. Reason: five, not 5. :P
2014-07-08 18:48:08
#22
Originally Posted by Storm88000
Originally Posted by mirrortints
Originally Posted by Kyle
I still cannot believe you removed the Marsh Tuned computer.....


Went from a Marsh Tune to JWT? LOL I'll say, VERY first pull 150whp. Just because you did the headgasket yourself.



Guess what, your idol Boostlee and I are cool now, in fact I may purchase his B14 real soon. So just stop. All you do is spew negativity. This isn't fucking ClubSi. It's supposed to be the community of us guys and occasional gals who took the other track instead of Hondas. Not constant insult after insults.

Making fun of a guy for being born with poor hearing is really really low. I think most would agree with that. Yet you still keep coming into threads I'm in, no one forces you to click or reply, but everytime there you are. Don't know what you get out of it.


Video tape the first pull and see if I'm right.
2014-07-08 18:48:52
#23
Well its typing on the internet, sometimes I get the feeling you get a little too into the discussion and you get angry. At least you handle it like a mature adult though.

And the MSD will stay as its always been at 5200 for all dyno tests. I just meant in the *meantime* if it would benefit me driving around. I wish someone was here that could drive it and feel the midrange difference. I haven't gone past 7400~ish RPM yet, but man its nice to have that lower power
Last edited by Storm88000 on 2014-07-08 at 18-51-20.
2014-07-08 18:52:03
#24
Originally Posted by Storm88000
Originally Posted by mirrortints
Originally Posted by Storm88000
Originally Posted by unijabnx2000
Im guessing less peak whp around 7-12


I'm doing this for science if in fact you guys are right, then we have definitive proof


Proof of what, exactly?

You altered the car, there's no proof of anything, either way.


To see that the JWT programmed ECU wont make as much peak power but I guarantee you its making more torque. significantly more, like 10ft-lbs. Its pleasantly surprising. Then I'll throw the Nismotronic in there and see what I get.


You had the head resurfaced...there's nothing to compare with the old dyno.
2014-07-08 18:57:02
#25
Well that's true but I can always redyno the Calum too
2014-07-08 19:22:51
#26
jamie tuned the car for peak whp we live above 6k so the midrange might be a little down compared to the jwt. if you wanted more midrange one pm to mark or jamie saying i want a tune to increase my midrange would of yielded better results for far less money.

did you check the block for straightness not just the head? you can get the head resurfaced all you want but if the block is out of wack wont make a difference.

i dont tell people what do with their money but damn you throwing it away trying a cookie cutter tune vs a programmable ecu
2014-07-08 20:19:16
#27
Originally Posted by Storm88000
Well its typing on the internet


Originally Posted by Storm88000
Well its typing on the internet



Originally Posted by Storm88000
Well its typing on the internet



Exactly, take it for what it's worth. Words on a screen.
2014-07-08 20:34:55
#28
Oh em gee. Leave Storm alone. He only inquired about changing the activation points, he didn't say he was going to do it.

And let him dyno both ECUs, as he said, and then we will all have the answers. Even though there have been edits from multiple posters, I always read this as a back to back dyno runs with the only variance being the ECUs.

Post the results Storm and then we will all know. Do you plan on just doing 1 run each? Just curious.
2014-07-09 03:36:48
#29
Thanks I'll do a couple runs for each one, let it cool down (depending on the ambient temps) up to an hour, then swap an do some runs.

And BTW I am almost at sea-level here at about 240ft. So if his was tuned for 6,000 feet I'd imagine that's def going to effect some things

- - - Updated - - -

Originally Posted by morgans432


i dont tell people what do with their money but damn you throwing it away trying a cookie cutter tune vs a programmable ecu


I didn't throw anything away man.
2014-07-09 12:44:16
#30
Originally Posted by Storm88000
And BTW I am almost at sea-level here at about 240ft. So if his was tuned for 6,000 feet I'd imagine that's def going to effect some things.


Oh geez...
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top