Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: JC custom 4-1 header

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 33
2013-10-25 12:58:16
#11
Originally Posted by liljay781
this is a header i made for a very good friend of mine, he was in need of something better than a ssac on his ve so i went with a tri y first but the bend where all types of fucked up from bottoming out so i tossed that project and decided to go with something simple and inexpensive. i made this header with regular aluminized pipe because i had some on hand at work , i made all the runners one piece for a cleaner look, the pipe is 1 3/4 all the way down where it goes into a split 2.25 or 2.0 collector, i made the entrance to the primaries about 1.75-2.0 by bumping them with my bender so it doesnt have a restiction in that area, it should flow very nicely but i want all of your opinions on it. in the future ill make another with stainless steel and take more time mocking things up. here she is



















Good work.

If you need any help testing let me know. You are more than welcome to use the dyno here for a compare again the SSAC etc.

I dont mind lending a hand.
2013-10-25 17:51:22
#12
Originally Posted by blo0d
not sure if thats gonna be better than the SSAC. The HS 5 which the SSAC ripped off was a damn good header. ASP budget struggled to beat it and yours is not as good as the budget.


If it doesn't crack, then it's 100000x better than a SSAC.
2013-10-25 17:56:11
#13
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R
Originally Posted by blo0d
not sure if thats gonna be better than the SSAC. The HS 5 which the SSAC ripped off was a damn good header. ASP budget struggled to beat it and yours is not as good as the budget.


On a intake/stock cam engine maybe.

The ASP budget blew the SSAC out of the water on every high comp 2.0L tested in the north east, especially after 7000rpm.


while driving to work I thought... i wonder if anyone was going to quote me and say the ssac would lose badly to the asp on a high comp build....

hehe. glad to have your input Jamie.
2013-10-25 17:58:00
#14
Originally Posted by squirlz
Good work on making something yourself.

Not everything has to be compared to everything else. If the header works for him than thats all that matters, no need to bash him for what he did or did not do.


bash? cmon. dont be sensitive....
2013-10-26 00:22:14
#15
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R
Originally Posted by liljay781
this is a header i made for a very good friend of mine, he was in need of something better than a ssac on his ve so i went with a tri y first but the bend where all types of fucked up from bottoming out so i tossed that project and decided to go with something simple and inexpensive. i made this header with regular aluminized pipe because i had some on hand at work , i made all the runners one piece for a cleaner look, the pipe is 1 3/4 all the way down where it goes into a split 2.25 or 2.0 collector, i made the entrance to the primaries about 1.75-2.0 by bumping them with my bender so it doesnt have a restiction in that area, it should flow very nicely but i want all of your opinions on it. in the future ill make another with stainless steel and take more time mocking things up. here she is



















Good work.

If you need any help testing let me know. You are more than welcome to use the dyno here for a compare again the SSAC etc.

I dont mind lending a hand.



good looking out, my boy who owns the header is planning on making an appt with u to get his nx tuned, we will see how this works out. thanks for the curtisy
2013-10-26 00:27:20
#16
all i have to say is that this was a super budget setup, im not looking for crazy power or anything, it was just a favor for a very very good friend of mine. hes happy with it and so am i. if i wanted to do something crazy and creative i would of. i was on a tight schedule and this is the only thing that i could come up with on short time. at the end of the day most people dont put up competition with my skills so at the end of the day it is what it is. i no what im good at and have plenty to back it up.
2013-10-26 18:20:57
#17
some a these comments are so funny.... ive seen piss work on a header that never saw the better part of 195, look like shit and yet the owner was happy about it. as u said.... as long as the owners happy then so be it... but just on a point of note we still wanna see the #s and hope its good to go.... all the best with it
2013-10-26 22:41:06
#18
Thank u sir
2013-10-27 16:26:12
#19
Originally Posted by THOR
some a these comments are so funny.... ive seen piss work on a header that never saw the better part of 195, look like shit and yet the owner was happy about it. as u said.... as long as the owners happy then so be it... but just on a point of note we still wanna see the #s and hope its good to go.... all the best with it


yawn...
2013-10-27 19:59:37
#20
Almost anything will make more power than SSAC or SSAC copy. IMHO, SSAC and their copies are over-rated

Even though tuning was probably an issue, I ditched a brand new 2.5 SSAC and go back to stock. Stock made more power. Most people who used SSAC do so because they get motors without the stock secondaries or maybe because they had to use 2nd O2 bung which stock doesn't have...

I made good power (better than stock) only after going to a modified SSAC

This header should do ok. My only concern is the 'crush bends' and how they will affect flow but you have already said that should not be a factor.

Looking forward to see before and after #s..

Peace
Last edited by niZmo on 2013-10-27 at 20-01-03.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top