Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Trackforged Tri-Y header completed!!!

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 181-190 of 233
2014-02-26 03:30:04
#181
Originally Posted by lynchfourtwenty
Jesus what did that car make before the header? Im curious cause when I drove it it was def slower then my car with n1 with same tune.

i believe around 173 more or less. 3 inch exhaust may be a possibility in the near future. But for now nismotronics should help me go in the right direction.
2014-02-26 03:34:39
#182
Originally Posted by Jesus
Originally Posted by lynchfourtwenty
Jesus what did that car make before the header? Im curious cause when I drove it it was def slower then my car with n1 with same tune.

i believe around 173 more or less. 3 inch exhaust may be a possibility in the near future. But for now nismotronics should help me go in the right direction.


thats actually not that bad, esp on the mustang dyno..
2014-02-26 03:38:00
#183
Originally Posted by TRACKFORGED
Here is the dyno sheet from the day. Please remember, this was dyno back to back on the same day. Nothing changed or tuned, except the header.
WORKING ON GETTING VIDEO TOGETHER



thats not bad at all, get rid of that nasty dip on vvl activation an maybe play with vvl points and it'll prob help up top as well.

what were the afr's?
2014-02-26 03:56:23
#184
Josh, lol not a thread for tuning...
2014-02-26 04:10:35
#185
i realize its really just for the whole back to back factor which is great, but im sure im not the only person who wants to see what it can do tuned, thus my bringing it up, sorry leng.

awesome stuff tho!
2014-02-26 05:21:36
#186
No worries, we will have another thread for the tuned factor soon lol
2014-02-26 12:05:49
#187
Wonderful work, well done lads.
looks kinda like an Xforce header
2014-02-26 12:13:59
#188
Sorry!! For being an ass!!
But if you are going to make a claim on a part you are going to advertise here!!
Back to back test has to be tuned vs tuned with afr graph shown on the test to be clear and to see the real gains from the header alone!!!
Same thing happened with the ASP budget header test made was biased to make it look good but real gains were not so good when tested by third parties!!
2014-02-26 14:59:03
#189
agree with Payu.... But a back to back test with just header changed is a damn good start.
2014-02-26 15:41:09
#190
@Payu this was a base back to back. There was no tuning involved, no changes in any maps, or such. Simple uninstall the SSAC and install our header. When I mentioned tuned, is because we are installing a nismotronic in jesus' s car in the next few days.

This is a bolt on test! Maybe you misread what I was typing, but if you want us to have it fully tuned on nismotronic and then uninstall the header and reinstall the ssac, we can do that as well.

Originally Posted by Payu
Sorry!! For being an ass!!
But if you are going to make a claim on a part you are going to advertise here!!
Back to back test has to be tuned vs tuned with afr graph shown on the test to be clear and to see the real gains from the header alone!!!
Same thing happened with the ASP budget header test made was biased to make it look good but real gains were not so good when tested by third parties!!
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top