Thread: My ve is too slow

At first I want to have the 190hp, I think he is too slow for 190hp. Or is the sr20ve at stock so slow and I my expectations are to high? Can I tune the engine with the stock ecu? That would be great, because I dont like such divided swaps.

Or can't I tune the car without the de ecu? The vvl point I can only change with a extra controller right? More revs only with a other ecu?

The question is... is the nx2000 with a stock sr20ve really so fast? Or do I have an other problem?

They are not that quick. A stock SR20VE makes 187hp to the crank. You figure the car weighs 2500lbs without people in it. The gearbox is too long which makes it feel even slower. Some guys have managed to get to 13's with stock cammed VE's. I have watched VE's as slow as running mid 15's.

I told you while ago, ditch that engine harness and use stock engine harness and stock ECU with daughterboard. You just dont listening...

This setup makes easily over 200hp. We dynoed 206hp/215Nm in Czech republic. Simple setup - stock VE, SSAC header 2.5", 2.75" exhaust, JWT popcharger, Calum ECU with !base! bin.

Remember, horsepower measured at the crank and horsepower measured at the wheels are two different things. Lots of drivetrain loss, I'm not sure, but I'd imagine at 187 crank hp, the average stock VE would dyno around 155-160 wheel HP.

As for your question about an NX with a stock SR20VE being "fast" .... it's all relative. It is fast if you think that a Civic EX (making 127hp stock) with an intake and exhaust is fast. It's not fast if you consider an Integra GS-R with a K-swap.

Im using the stock engine harness and the stock ecu. Whitch daughterboard do you mean? Nistune dont support the sr20ve ecu, or u mean the de ecu?




I mean the integra with stock b18 engine, is it faster as a nx2000 with stock sr20ve? I know... the nx2000 with my sr20ve is not a racecar I just want to know if my video is normal.

I'd say a stock Acura Integra GS-R would lose to a NX2000 with the SR20VE swap because the VE has a lot more torque down low. Hell, a stock or lightly modded SR20DE will give a stock GS-R a good run.

My VE
0- 62mph = 8.64 seconds
0- 87mph = 14.85 seconds
0- 100mph = 20.56 seconds
0- 112mph = 25.50 seconds

They are the timings from my video...

Nissan NX2000
0- 62mph = 8.2 seconds
0- 87mph = 16.9 seconds
0- 100mph = 22.6 seconds
0- 112mph = ???? seconds

Acura Integra GS-R (Honda Integra Type-R in germany)
0- 62km/h = 6.8 seconds
0- 87km/h = 12.4 seconds
0- 100mph = 16.5 seconds
0- 112mph = 21.70 seconds

This times is from here: ZePerfs : Select car for a duel

If that's true, then I think there's something wrong with your car or you have the wrong ECU or something. A stock 1991 Sentra SE-R ran 7.8 or something from 0-60mph. Remember, that had 140hp, 132 ft lbs of torque at the crank, usually making around 120-124hp at the wheels.

I can tell you that my bolt on 97 200sx SE-R (with stock SR20DE with 180k) is at least 2 seconds faster than that.

Consider that the Type R has about 25 more hp than the GS-R.

U can see it on my video in my first posting. I think something is wrong, but I what is it? Maybe y`all unterstand because my broken english.



190hp 1.8l has the german type-r