Thread: My ve is too slow

+ Reply To Thread

First

Last

Posts: 71-80 of 107

Search Thread

2012-10-08 06:40:04

#71

ca18 bluebird Online/offline status of ca18 bluebird is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2008-07-23
Location:
Posts: 890
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Also to the op, if you current harness is sr20ve, I am not sure, but think you can just plug a sr16ve ecu straight into it. It has much more aggressive tunes and also a 8200rpm limiter (i believe the original calums are based on this file). You can have this ecu very cheap. Might be a good plug and play option for you if you can not find good tuners where you are.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-08 13:20:16

#72

Vadim

Administrator

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: VA
Posts: 16,221
Trader Score: 48 (100%)

Originally Posted by ca18

Although I agree I wouldn't call the tuner lazy. He prob has just only tuned with nistune in the past and is a little skeptic of something new that he is unfamiliar with.

Rather than the OP trying to find a new tuner, he should have a chat to the one he has as I doubt there are many people in germany that have heard of nistmotronic

Calling them lazy is a bit too far stretched, but it does show that the tuner doesn't really want your money. If I was a Nissan Sentra repair shop and someone brought me a Maxima, if I really needed the money I would help them, otherwise send them to the Maxima repair shop. But in this case the difference is not even that great

Originally Posted by ca18
Also to the op, if you current harness is sr20ve, I am not sure, but think you can just plug a sr16ve ecu straight into it. It has much more aggressive tunes and also a 8200rpm limiter (i believe the original calums are based on this file). You can have this ecu very cheap. Might be a good plug and play option for you if you can not find good tuners where you are.

That's actually a pretty good idea, though you would have to make sure injectors are the same along with maf.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

00 G20t KH3- Loller Rocker + GT28 + 6 Speed
05 Legacy GT - Big 16G @13psi + Up Pipe + Downpipe
12 Outback 2.5i Premium - Stock

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-08 13:23:48

#73

Agent Nupe Online/offline status of Agent Nupe is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2011-03-31
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,462
Trader Score: 20 (100%)

Mind the 110mph governor. ^

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

91 b13 ve-t strapped
99' p11 touring edition, honda gsr 4:1 header.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-08 13:25:48

#74

ca18 bluebird Online/offline status of ca18 bluebird is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2008-07-23
Location:
Posts: 890
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Originally Posted by Vadim

Originally Posted by ca18

Originally Posted by ca18
Also to the op, if you current harness is sr20ve, I am not sure, but think you can just plug a sr16ve ecu straight into it. It has much more aggressive tunes and also a 8200rpm limiter (i believe the original calums are based on this file). You can have this ecu very cheap. Might be a good plug and play option for you if you can not find good tuners where you are.

That's actually a pretty good idea, though you would have to make sure injectors are the same along with maf.

I believe the sr16ve maf and injectors are the same and sr20ve? anyone else can can correct if I am wrong? If not I might still have them floating around

They are both plenty big for most NA applications

Last edited by ca18 bluebird on 2012-10-08 at 13-26-39.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-08 14:29:54

#75

b12sr20ve

Member

Join Date: 2011-07-05
Location:
Posts: 833
Trader Score: 1 (100%)

It isa straight swap.but the tune is diff.my car did not run smooth with it. Need to put some piggy back in it.sold this and got a nemu

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-10-08 19:34:45

#76

jagy

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-23
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 2,428
Trader Score: 11 (100%)

Originally Posted by ca18
I believe the sr16ve maf and injectors are the same and sr20ve? anyone else can can correct if I am wrong? If not I might still have them floating around

They are both plenty big for most NA applications

Yes, MAF and injectors are the same. But it will run lean on SR16VE ecu. I dont think this is best idea at all... unless he has 370cc to drop in an AFPR to control them a little bit.

Still i would do it how its supposed to be done.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-12-06 01:54:22

#77

ser101

every1's fave n00b

Join Date: 2012-05-05
Location:
Posts: 106
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Originally Posted by Storm88000

Originally Posted by riverna
My VE
0- 62mph = 8.64 seconds
0- 87mph = 14.85 seconds
0- 100mph = 20.56 seconds
0- 112mph = 25.50 seconds

If that's true, then I think there's something wrong with your car or you have the wrong ECU or something. A stock 1991 Sentra SE-R ran 7.8 or something from 0-60mph. Remember, that had 140hp, 132 ft lbs of torque at the crank, usually making around 120-124hp at the wheels.

I can tell you that my bolt on 97 200sx SE-R (with stock SR20DE with 180k) is at least 2 seconds faster than that.

ressuurreccttedddd

so you're saying 'bolt on' 200sx yours does 6.6sec 0-60? !!!

if so damn thats fast

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

When life is passing by, DOWNSHIFT!

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-12-06 12:04:57

#78

Storm88000 Online/offline status of Storm88000 is unknown

Oh well....

Join Date: 2012-01-27
Location: Philly Burbs
Posts: 6,642
Trader Score: 46 (98%)

6.6 seconds is not that fast.. Compared to a minivan, sure

Last edited by Storm88000 on 2012-12-06 at 12-34-29.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Jordan
‘20 Mazda MX-5, ‘20 Toyota Prime, ‘19 Subaru WRX
Music - - My SR20 website

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-12-06 13:36:11

#79

SE-Rtainlyb13 Online/offline status of SE-Rtainlyb13 is unknown

John 5:24

Join Date: 2009-01-08
Location:
Posts: 846
Trader Score: 8 (100%)

I think 6.6 is a little too quick for a bolt-on b13. I'd say high 6's is about right. Like 6.8-6.9. Either way, the guy's VE should be at least sub 7 with his set-up. When he first said 2 seconds faster than a stock one, I thought "he wants 5.6 to 60?" because I've seen stock b13's do mid-7's to 60 in several reviews. That was new of course though. I would think a non-cammed VE would be low 6's. 1/4 mile times are more important though.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

"Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved." - Acts 16:31 (the good news of Jesus Christ) - PM me if you wanna talk about this!
1992 Nissan Sentra SE-R - Mostly original at 125k miles.
2001 Toyota Tundra SR5 4X4 - Stock and boring.
1971 Jeep CJ5 - Dauntless V6, 3spd manual. Super slow and super fun.

Reply Reply With Quote

2012-12-06 14:01:07

#80

ser101

every1's fave n00b

Join Date: 2012-05-05
Location:
Posts: 106
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Bolt on as in cams too?

6.6 puts you faster than 60% of everyday cars out there, granted they can't drive right. 6.6 is in the range of older mustang gts, supercharged gtps, cobalt ss and some older neon srt4s and faster than rsx-s, gts, xrs, spec v's and even stock wrx if they can't drive.

That's good enough for me, tell me your setup storm lol..

I agree s-ertainlyb13, my bolt on nx does 60 in like 8 secs haha

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

When life is passing by, DOWNSHIFT!

Reply Reply With Quote

First

Last

+ Reply To Thread

Thread Information

There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
StubUserName