Originally Posted by
B15NEOVVL 
Wow. Impressive numbers and yes, thank-you for sharing!
Questions, (if you don't mind):
1) Can you guess how much more whp you might make on this same set-up, with say 100 octane?
2) Also, with the same components but with say 14:1 and C14 or C16 fuel?
3) Why did you go smaller with the exhaust cam, is it because of the port work or ITB's?
3) Are these the custom cams that require work to the valvetrain or are they still under 12.5/6mm?
Appreciate anything you might have to say!
1. 100 octane will not do much. Higher octane only helps where a setup is knock limited. A lot of people do not know you will make less power NA as it takes more energy to burn 100 vs 93.
2. No real way to guess that. Higher comp will (in most cases) make more power. That number is determined by supporting mods.
3. There are a few reasons. Can't say much until other tests are done.
4. These cams are still small. No larger than a Kelford intake and Exhaust is smaller than the Kelford 184c.
Originally Posted by
anomaly lol.
see it deh... so explain the 92 mm bore with this set up to the man dem.
Too small for the 92mm but still made over 295whp.
Originally Posted by
1FastP11 Pics of the engine bay?
I don't have any. Maybe one of the guys will post one later.
Originally Posted by
ashtonsser Great job Jamie, Im very interested in the cam combo if your willing to share. PM me some info if you dont mind.
I would imagine the smaller exhaust cam would be to keep the velocity up on the ported head. Very interesting.
Pretty much. Still a stock valve head.
Tried something a little different with the ports than what I did to Bes's head. Nothing crazy like mine.
Originally Posted by
b12sr20ve Omfg.! What a breakthrough. Imagine if this is a 2.4!
2.4's have a long way to go. This is good and bad. Good because 320+whp will happen, bad because more shit needs to be bought :-/
Originally Posted by
PacificBlueB14 Great work like always and what cars this in?
Lightweight B13
Be the first to like this post.
Back to top