Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: common problems with log manifolds

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 44
2012-07-11 12:47:22
#11
Originally Posted by gio94sr20ve
Originally Posted by liljay781
I'm looking for 400-500 but wanted to hear everyone's common issues. I'm going to build my own manifold in the future but going to have to deal with the log for now unless if it feels too restrictive then ill start mine


and Stick to your stock 2.0 cams


X10! Very few would say/do this.....
2012-07-11 12:51:39
#12
Originally Posted by Dave_SR20
No. I'm guessing VE Boosting head is more restrictive on a Log than a DE?


We swapped a full de motor with bc stage 2 cams to a Vvl head (he misshifted and broke the rocker arms and valves) and gained only 27whp at 20 psi over the de head with bc cams.
2012-07-11 12:53:49
#13
Originally Posted by liljay781
I'm looking for 400-500 but wanted to hear everyone's common issues. I'm going to build my own manifold in the future but going to have to deal with the log for now unless if it feels too restrictive then ill start mine


That's going to be hard to do. Look up Coheed's build to get an idea.

Originally Posted by gio94sr20ve
If you are looking for that power level you will need fuel better than 93octane to reach it on a log,e-85,110oct,meth injection.and Stick to your stock 2.0 cams


Either 2.0 cams or VET cams, VET cams are much more log friendly (13* of overlap which is almost as low as regular SR20's).
2012-07-11 12:57:39
#14
Originally Posted by Dave_SR20
No. I'm guessing VE Boosting head is more restrictive on a Log than a DE?


De head with log isn't bad, ve head with log blows peen
2012-07-11 13:37:50
#15
Simple Solution! DE All the way
2012-07-11 14:13:28
#16
Great topic tubular vs log. What about the cracking that happens with these tubular manies? The cast iron manifolds never crack.
2012-07-11 14:35:21
#17
Tubulars if made with the proper Schedule Stainless and proper welds/bracing will hold up just fine
2012-07-11 14:36:29
#18
I've yet to see a "custom" tubular mani crack. The ebay tubular love to crack though...
2012-07-11 16:13:48
#19
Originally Posted by gio94sr20ve
Originally Posted by Dave_SR20
No. I'm guessing VE Boosting head is more restrictive on a Log than a DE?


We swapped a full de motor with bc stage 2 cams to a Vvl head (he misshifted and broke the rocker arms and valves) and gained only 27whp at 20 psi over the de head with bc cams.


what manifold and turbo?
2012-07-11 16:28:49
#20
Originally Posted by blo0d
Originally Posted by gio94sr20ve
Originally Posted by Dave_SR20
No. I'm guessing VE Boosting head is more restrictive on a Log than a DE?


We swapped a full de motor with bc stage 2 cams to a Vvl head (he misshifted and broke the rocker arms and valves) and gained only 27whp at 20 psi over the de head with bc cams.


what manifold and turbo?


Those gains were on a log manifold and 57mm Garrett turbo. Once he went with a tubular I made him he gained more power at less boost.vvl head swap gains are ridiculous when you have a good flowing setup.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top