Thread: Todays dyno charts

Well I would think the main benefit for part throttle tuning would be gas mileage, and response? I was just thinking when you are cruising around, if it was tuned verse a rich tune it might respond better to slight inputs?

Perhaps some of the more knowledgeable folk can chime in with how often partial throttle tuning is necessary or beneficial?

Dudeman

i have kind of come to the conclusion that as long as the afr is good under all conditions that i would leave the part throttle timming alone, atleast until i change the cr

I don't know why, I thought you were talking about 44psi with the hose connected


Thanks for that explaination and visualization! It actually helped quite a bit with understanding the tables. Are you using rom editor?

Unfortunately, I have am still using my basic calum ecu So it will take quite a bit more time on the rollers to pull the roms and burn them after every change. I need to just break down and get the realtime.....

Didn't it come with one?

Soooo.....when are we gonna meet up?

Dudeman: better throttle response may be had by a small bump in timing. but like Cory said, gotta watch afr's. she's already mapped for stoich at light throttle.
jer_760: i'm using Tuner Pro RT and EmUtility.
Dan: you have a PM
(i smell 220+ on the Intec Dynojet)

What springs/retainers did you throw in with the n1 cams if any?

BC springs/oem retainers

Hmm...I'll have to try those two and see if they are more user friendly.

Ric - Why both TunerPro RT & Emutility? The emulation function on TunerPro works well for me.

I was wondering what timing map you started with, the OEM 20VE or 16VE?

ya know, your right. i haven't used EmUtility. i downloaded it last year when i was researching the Calum rt ecu (maybe he mentioned it). i originally thought TPRT was gonna use EmU. for emulating
i've used TPRT exclusively. and it's actually quite fun, though expensive, on the dyno.
the oem b14 ecu started w/the stock sr20ve program from Calum.