Dollar for dollar, a T25 setup would be cheaper and make more TQ on the low end.
Keep in mind, while it is cheaper you are adding more variables and weight to the mix.
Like you said Chris, it comes down down to what you are doing and how much you have to spend. With a $2000 budget I would say the VE still gets the cake for overall performance and reliability. Less weight, broader powerband, killer response and less shock on our fragile drivetrain.
No bias here as I am both a turbo and NA guy.
Keep in mind, while it is cheaper you are adding more variables and weight to the mix.
Like you said Chris, it comes down down to what you are doing and how much you have to spend. With a $2000 budget I would say the VE still gets the cake for overall performance and reliability. Less weight, broader powerband, killer response and less shock on our fragile drivetrain.
No bias here as I am both a turbo and NA guy.
Originally Posted by Chriscar
Some of you seem to have a bias towards VVL or turbo, and create a scenario to 'prove' your point.
Can a VE be faster than a turbo? Yes
Can a turbo be faster than a VE? Yes
Can a DE be faster than a turbo? Yes
etc, etc, bla bla bla
The better question is what does it take, money wise, and skill wise to do it?
Dollar for dollar, which is better? I know what my answer is, what about you guys?
C
Some of you seem to have a bias towards VVL or turbo, and create a scenario to 'prove' your point.
Can a VE be faster than a turbo? Yes
Can a turbo be faster than a VE? Yes
Can a DE be faster than a turbo? Yes
etc, etc, bla bla bla
The better question is what does it take, money wise, and skill wise to do it?
Dollar for dollar, which is better? I know what my answer is, what about you guys?
C