Originally Posted by
jRod Would it be possible to just use a DE lower oil pan instead? I dont recall if the DE block is any wider at the bottom than the VE block....
Thats a pretty damn good idea.. I think you can get 10 units (minimum) sold for $400 each thatd be pretty awesome!!!
im trying to remember, what motor has what. i know my 16ve had a baffle in the upper pan. iirc the de's and the ve's dont. i also did not run a gurdle as i didnt see it being neccessary.
Originally Posted by
nismo94tuner I would put a lot of thought into going all out with a 92mm crank guys. Its not a easy task to take on. Things start getting very expensive.
very expensive. you looking at spending 11 grand or so depending on what parts you use.
Originally Posted by
jRod What are you refering to as far as trial and error? Do you mean as far as the crank design? It would be scary to buy a cheap chinese knock off as opposed to something I know is quality engineered and manufactured, especially the crank..that is literally the backbone of the reciprocating assembly of the engine LOL
no one has had a problem with these cranks. they are all made by the same company. the one you in the link is the one brian crower sells etc etc. all made by the same manufacturing plant, they are just milled/cut by the companys to look diffrent.
as far as trial and error, for the most part we have the medium understanding on what needs to be done to get a 2.2 or a 2.4 to run right.
its simple in writing but much more diffucult to in real life to accomplish.
look at it like this and ill use this as an example.
dres 2.3 90x91 20ve pump gas motor made--24X iirc
teals 2.4 92x92 pump gas motor made --24X irrc
fazils 2.4 92x92 pump gas motor made ---24X iirc.
juns 2.2 90mm race gas motor- made ---27X iirc.
corys 2.3 92mm pump gas motor made -- 27X iirc.
corys 2.4 92x92 e85 gas motor made ----28X iirc
jaimes 2.4 92x92 pump gas motor made -28X iirc.
now if you look at the variation of parts on motors you will see were the money and r&d comes into play. im not even going to speak about fuel and what these motors are tuned on cause thats a book within itself.
the motors are so close in numbers but vary so greatly in parts and compression. granted each motor utilizes almost completely different parts ie. intake mani, header, cams, head work, valves etc etc.
there comes a point were your spending thousands of dollars for a few hp. for your average or even extreme guy this is to much to spend for such minor gains.
would it be cool to have a 2.3 that puts down 240 sure but your spending close to 6 grand to accomplish that. and thats with not the best parts, your still leaving alot of power on the table, and to get it you have to spend thousands more. and still were not to sure what combination really and i mean REALLY works.
i took from these builds the best characteristics and parts and tweeked em to some degree to a spec that i feel will work the best, the same as the rest of the guys did albiet on whatever budget we all were working with.
but at the end of the day, the motor will only make what its gonna make. we have dets and for the most part 2.0 ves down to a science. but what really works for a 2.2 or a 2.3 or a 2.4 we really dont know. there is what 9 of these motors in the country out of what hundreds in our community and thousands around the world.
for us to figure out what works with 100% certainty we need another 50 motors to be built in various configurations to really narrow down what makes power.
jaime is now saying he feels the rod/stroke ratio is to blame for us not making well over 300whp. so what we need is some one to do a long rode 92x92.
i could go on and on, but what im trying to say, is all this real big n/a stuff is still in its infancy and how we decided to build our motors is still only a educated guess.
we need to get it down to a science and then and only then will the real power of the big cc n/a motors be realized.
end rant.
stratton.