data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a57/45a57bdb074e07877ddbbc71b5e016a904b7f2be" alt=""
now i know someone has already done this, with some proven albeit slight gains.
But im wondering if you were to take it a step further and completely do away with the flanges making it a 1 piece header and just attach the 2" secondaries to the y pieces and run them down about 10-12 inches and then step it up to 2 1/8" or 2 1/4" for another 10-12 inches to the 2.5" collector then to the 3" flex tube an out do the 3" pipe to the cat. would that even work? or am i sniffin glue?
this would be something for a 2.0 with n1 cams an possibly 16ve pistons down the road..
my guess would be it would most likely do better then a stock ssac, but would it do better then just bumping them to 2" then out to 3" ?
sadly i cannot afford a real 4-1 header and if i can spend a few hunskie making the ssac a little better then why not..
anyway lookin to her some opinions from people who know their stuff, TIA
But im wondering if you were to take it a step further and completely do away with the flanges making it a 1 piece header and just attach the 2" secondaries to the y pieces and run them down about 10-12 inches and then step it up to 2 1/8" or 2 1/4" for another 10-12 inches to the 2.5" collector then to the 3" flex tube an out do the 3" pipe to the cat. would that even work? or am i sniffin glue?
this would be something for a 2.0 with n1 cams an possibly 16ve pistons down the road..
my guess would be it would most likely do better then a stock ssac, but would it do better then just bumping them to 2" then out to 3" ?
sadly i cannot afford a real 4-1 header and if i can spend a few hunskie making the ssac a little better then why not..
anyway lookin to her some opinions from people who know their stuff, TIA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b41b6/b41b6cbe337a3650b4370eaaf997c82c5ba07a31" alt="bigthumbup"