Thread: Thoughts on modding an ssac

Go with tri y its worth the money and you have the pics in my thread

you know its funny, after looking at some tri-y pics and then i seen a asp budget header pic an they look really similar.. granted each was designed to "fit" different cars.

asp



tri-y




so i wonder why the home brew franken tri-y does well but the asp budget didnt really do that great?

At least use a 2-1 merge collector with a 2.25" choke and then the transition to 3" to keep the exhaust velocity..

I'm actually doing a 2.5" choke and then 3"

http://www.sr20-forum.com/vvl/15581-check-out-my-custom-secondaries-downpipe.html

you should be fine with that

peace

2.25" choke has been proven to get better results than 2.5" at least on the 2.0L Not always bigger means better jajajajaja at least on headers
Even on OBX, Pacesetter and SSAC headers.....

But are you talking 4-1 or 421. I think the 421 can get away with running a bit larger then 2.25. Although I don't have any first hand w tri ys

Even on 421 and the B18 Tri y with 2.25" choke give better results OBX Same as Pacesetter with smaller primaries give better numbers than SSAC with the downpipe modified after the choke

2.25" is a good choke for our 2.0L.

Theirs some thing else the last two tubes most be has long it cuold be and the asp are short and we made a tri y with the last two tubes short and we only saw 3hp on the header theirs another header just like the tri y I think I saaw a pic its the prototy or protech something like that here on the forum if some one knows put the pics