Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: 236WHP & 165Torque Stock Bottom End

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 161-170 of 242
2011-03-23 21:54:14
#161
Originally Posted by Daves_sr
pm me i can get you them if you want them


^I thought they were under a redesign? #shrug.
2011-03-23 22:27:35
#162
Yea where are the trumpets from? I've been looking for awhile for some decent velocity stacks.
2011-03-23 22:54:09
#163
Ross Machine Racing - Velocity Stacks
2011-03-23 22:59:59
#164
ninja edit.
2011-03-23 23:08:30
#165
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R
Car needs to be re-dyno'd.

Has nothing to do with tuning, header or intake manifold. There is no magic trick involved espcially dealing with a "mostly stock motor".

Dyno faults happen all the time. Delays in weather station readings, inlet temp etc can cause inflation in #'s. I would rather fix the issue and verify before my name goes out there to be giving out false dyno #'s.

Issue is being looked into by dyno dynamics as we speak.



I have to give SR20GTi-R credit for being upfront about the possible calibration problem with this particular dyno.

Early on, I had my doubt about the #s coming from the big bore builds and this 2.0 engine. I have no problem with the hp power figures, but it was the peak torque figures that raised a red flag for me. Like others have mention, to make high hp all you have to do is to maintain the torque at a higher rpm, but peak torque is a measure equivalent to volumetric efficiency. To put it into to perspective lets look at some high performance engines.

The highest torque per liter for a production car is from the new Ferrari 458 Italia at 89 ft-lbs/liter or 400 ft-lbs/4.499 cc.

Racing engines:

2006 F1 2.4 liter, 214 ft-lbs peak torque= 89 ft-lbs/liter
2006 Nascar 5.87 liter, 520 ft-lbs peak torque= 88.5 ft-lb/liter
Prostock 95 ft-lb/liter

As you can see, the Prostock engine is the king of NA engines excluding Diesel and Rotary.

Remember, these figures are at the crank.

Now lets look at the big bore VE making 234ft-lbs at the wheel, 234 ft-lbs/ 2.4 liter = 97.5 ft-lbs/ liter, that figure would shame all the all out racing engines. This is where I have my doubts.

In order for a NA 2.0 VE to make the same 97.5 ft-lbs/liter, it would have to make a peak torque of 195 ft-lbs at wheel, not possible.

Other than the dyno dynamic being off, I think you guys are doing a great job.
2011-03-23 23:12:02
#166
5speed just broke it down.

stratton.
2011-03-24 00:06:32
#167
I like the professionalism going on around here. Keep up the good work fellows.
2011-03-24 02:26:03
#168
Who cares what a dyno reads anyways? If it's slow down a track high hp numbers don't mean shit.

I'd rather have a 400 hp 11 sec car than 1200 hp 12 sec car.

In other news, what size trumpets did you use in that im?
2011-03-24 02:33:08
#169
If k20s and b20vtecs can do it y not a properly tuned vvl ?? Only way put this thing at the track Mph don't lie
2011-03-24 02:35:32
#170
k20's theres stock f3 k20s doing 250 whp with bolt ons, stock motors !

a b20vtec is not a stock motor in anyway. its a built motor either way you look at it.

stratton.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top