Thread: 230hp VE, its so easy!

More like why print it at all. Just post the file..

Lmao...

makes me wonder if it didn't make the same numbers again.. i find it funny that people come out boasting some outrageous claims then nothing.. no proof or anything..

not that it matters an im not tryin to bash anyone.. just dont see a point in posting crazy numbers and not backing them up.. you know people are gonna question such an outrageous claim so not posting the proof right away is asking for it..

on the other hand maybe there was some issues with the dyno an their embarrassed? or their just fed up with our shit an dont care what we think lol

same printers you used to print out reciepts for the carbon fiber trunks ?



cory, once we install springs and retainers it will be back on the dyno. should make a bit more power with a good dizzy and not floating valves around 75ish. i will be sure to got a copy of the file, vids etc. you should know im not one to hold info back, when weve had plenty of conversations about juns drag header and his specs along with bench building big block ve's.

agian dynos or for tunning purposes only.

these are dynapack numbers, so this may have caused the confusion. on a non hub dyno it will read lower, 20%ish give or take.

stratton.

Well I weft look forward to the graph and still woulndt mind knowing the specs on juns drag header.

your kidding lol. i told you them a long time ago...

stratton.

Well now that explains it. Could have atleast said that in the beginning.

X2, exactly.




Wow, the storys keep changing. First the claim was the 232 whp was done on a dyno dynamic 1800 (which you deleted) and now it will makes 20% less which is 185 whp.

Don't hold for breaths people, you won't see a 232 whp graph. I just went over again on ALLMTRB13's setup. He doesn't have an custom intake manifold, just a regular stock intake manifold. The motor is probably peaking around 7500-7800 rpm which makes it even harder to get 232 whp.

ugh, Dynapack numbers are not even close to being 20 percent higher. Thats more than just calculating for drivetrain loss. A dynapac is a hub dyno, which measures bhp. Hp at the brakes. The only thing left after that to affect hp is the wheels, tires, and tire pressure. Nowhere near 20 percent. You lose maybe 5-7% from bhp to whp. Not 20 percent. You guys are arguing over nothing.

Its pointless. Who cares. Wait till there is proof, then what are you going to say? If there isnt then oh well. Give it up.

Why is it soo hard to believe a 2.0L VE can make 232whp. An average VE with an average tune stock makes around 170whp. How hard is it to believe that a properly modified meaning everything, intake, intake mani, cams, s&r's, proper header, free flowing exhaust, pullies, flywheel, and most important of all a good tune. I dont know if there is headwork done to the motor or not either but if so then that goes even more to my point.

DE's have been making 60+whp over stock with proper bolt ons for years. Whats to say a ve with a better flowing head cant do it. There are many many people out there with less stuff making 215+whp. With the proper combination of parts 230whp is very believable and attainable.