Join Date: 2009-02-18 Location: Canton, Connecticut, United States Posts: 4,605 Trader Score: 41 (100%)
I read both of these the other day at work and was like where did this come from. It seems to be written a little while ago as it makes no mention to the Mazworx crank. Which in my opinion is the best option when going for big NA power.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
JimmiSPEC
Need parts? PM me!
SR20DEEP CT
Originally Posted by Ulysses You are the Chuck Norris of sentras.
my old VE had 171whp and the dyno measured the crank power to 211bhp, so id say 185whp is more like 230bhp which a lot of you on here have anyway with only bolt ons and N1's or regualr SR16 cams
1992 SE-R 66K miles Original Ownerhttp://tinyurl.com/yf58tfr
2014 Mazda 6 6mt
2011 ix35 5mt
"I spent a lot of money on booze, birds, and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." - G. Best
- Why is it that I keep seeing guys with 170ish WHP VE's raving that it is so much better than the DE's when the DE's are making 165WHP right behind them. If I build a VE and it's not making 200+ WHP, I would say I'm doing it wrong! Personal opinion.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
1993 SE-R | 2.0L Full bolt-on setup | 2.3L VE up next | 2015 Q50-S | 3.7L The Sunday car | 2003 Kia Rio-cinco | 1.6L gas saving daily driver |
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R NA is a thinking man's game, alot of people dont have the stomach to play NA.
Originally Posted by MR-4Door-SR20DET - Why is it that I keep seeing guys with 170ish WHP VE's raving that it is so much better than the DE's when the DE's are making 165WHP right behind them.