Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Please List WHP With SR20VE Cams And N1 Cams

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 41-50 of 152
2010-04-30 23:54:50
#41
My car made 187 stock, UNTUNED, UR Crank Pulley, Fidanza flywheel, N1 cams, stock intake hose, ebay header
2010-05-02 19:42:22
#42
197/140ish , n1's popcharger, 20v header into 2.5 mandrel bent exhaust, calum basic untuned.
2010-09-01 20:18:57
#43
2010-09-01 20:22:46
#44
Don, that torque cur--- line is badass.

Is your air fuel standard set at 12.0? Running a little fat, arent you?



A little off topic, why is everyone using the STD correction factor? I thought SAE was expected here? People gave me hell for using STD correction factors and I am just wondering. All of these graphs are great looking and make me want a VE even more.
2010-09-01 20:55:07
#45
Yeah your right. std means nothing. sae will take air temps, pressure and ect into account for your numbers..
2010-09-01 21:30:45
#46
Originally Posted by cory
Yeah your right. std means nothing. sae will take air temps, pressure and ect into account for your numbers..


Your engine is a beast, cory. That is nasty. I love it. I want more of it. Do you have any videos or pictures somewhere?
2010-09-01 21:50:31
#47
Originally Posted by cory
Yeah your right. std means nothing. sae will take air temps, pressure and ect into account for your numbers..


There is nothing wrong with using STD. It will also take temperature, pressure, humidity, and altitude into consideration. STD use different factors is all.

SAE Factors are: 77* F, 29.23 barometric pressure, 0 humidity, 0 altitude

STD: 60* F, 29.92 pressure, 0 humidity, 0 altitude

DIN: 68* F, 29.23 pressure, 0 humidity, 0 altitude

What this all means is you will get higher # using STD correction factors. We have been saying this for awhile but the Florida people don't think it applies to them.

This guy says it better: Official GTAMC Forums - SAE .vs. STD Dyno Numbers
2010-09-01 21:52:21
#48
151hp atw... fail... (n1's @ -5 +5) 2.5" mandrel exhaust with ssac's, 380cc injectors, rx7 fuel pump, lx91 coil, custom intake manifold, 80mm TB, apexi power fc, greddy mss, tuned very badly...vvl at 6300 only goes till 8000... it feels like alot of torque though, so i looked at the dyno sheet and it said 696nm... however not sure how true that is,,,,
2010-09-01 21:56:02
#49
im gonna try and get my pals dyno sheet , so i can post it up here . if i remember he made 209whp and like 170 on the torque . it was done on a dyno jet .
2010-09-01 21:57:12
#50
Originally Posted by Viprdude
Don, that torque cur--- line is badass.

Is your air fuel standard set at 12.0? Running a little fat, arent you?



A little off topic, why is everyone using the STD correction factor? I thought SAE was expected here? People gave me hell for using STD correction factors and I am just wondering. All of these graphs are great looking and make me want a VE even more.


Yes, its running fat. That was the first run and the radiator cracked so we stopped at 7k. You can see the missing portion of the graph when it sprayed everywhere.

I honestly don't care for the correction factor. I'm using the dyno as a tool.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top