Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: What we've been up to(new numbers posted on page 5)

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 201-210 of 688
2010-04-20 07:08:06
#201
it will still rip even at 86x86 but id love to see whos gona be the first with a 92x92 VVL with a snail stuck on there..
2010-04-20 15:49:17
#202
Originally Posted by Raceworx
it will still rip even at 86x86 but id love to see whos gona be the first with a 92x92 VVL with a snail stuck on there..


i honestly do not think thats neccessary, look at what mikes 90x 86 vet did ! it cranked out some of the highest fwd numbers ever.

unless its a dedicated track car with tons of back up trannys i dont think a 92x92 is needed.

especially when power is truely dictated by the turbo.

stratton.
2010-04-20 15:52:56
#203
Of course it's not necessary, but I'd like to see numbers on that set-up as well...
2010-04-20 15:54:15
#204
oh yeah i know its complete overkill but sometimes some of the best stuff is overkill..

you could mate it to a beefed up 6speed.. would be great to see one of the worlds first FWD 1000BHP SR20's iv seen a few FWC K's pushing 1000+ there pointless get no traction and break every five minuits but there nice bits of shinney to look at..

it would just be a "because i can" motor not a "we need the power" one
2010-04-20 16:07:33
#205
just stay in the scene and you will see it I can garuntee that
2010-04-20 16:10:21
#206
Originally Posted by STRATTON
i honestly do not think thats neccessary, look at what mikes 90x 86 vet did ! it cranked out some of the highest fwd numbers ever.

unless its a dedicated track car with tons of back up trannys i dont think a 92x92 is needed.

especially when power is truely dictated by the turbo.

stratton.


truth, im trying to keep this as simple as possible

Originally Posted by Raceworx
oh yeah i know its complete overkill but sometimes some of the best stuff is overkill..

you could mate it to a beefed up 6speed.. would be great to see one of the worlds first FWD 1000BHP SR20's iv seen a few FWC K's pushing 1000+ there pointless get no traction and break every five minuits but there nice bits of shinney to look at..

it would just be a "because i can" motor not a "we need the power" one


this is going in a full weight p11. Im just going to try to make the most efficient numbers i can.
2010-04-22 01:23:20
#207
Originally Posted by jpsr20det
apologies to the late responce... 0-60 no idea probably under 5 seg with good traccion( not the case here 1 and 2 gear with traccion)...top speed I havent tested yet.
and update with the tune.
18lbs



Here is the current challenge.
2010-04-22 01:49:22
#208
you dont build a car to please other people you do it for your own personal enjoyment...
2010-04-22 01:58:40
#209
tell em morgan..
2010-04-22 02:32:22
#210
Originally Posted by morgans432
you dont build a car to please other people you do it for your own personal enjoyment...


i like that one
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top