oh yeah i know its complete overkill but sometimes some of the best stuff is overkill..
you could mate it to a beefed up 6speed.. would be great to see one of the worlds first FWD 1000BHP SR20's iv seen a few FWC K's pushing 1000+ there pointless get no traction and break every five minuits but there nice bits of shinney to look at..
it would just be a "because i can" motor not a "we need the power" one
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
_________________________
|.............Overnight...................|__||_
|........Parts From Japan.YO!......|__|'|"\.__
|_..._..____________======||_|__|...,...]
"(@)'(@)''''''''''''''''''''''''*|(@)(@)******"(@)"
Originally Posted by STRATTON i honestly do not think thats neccessary, look at what mikes 90x 86 vet did ! it cranked out some of the highest fwd numbers ever.
unless its a dedicated track car with tons of back up trannys i dont think a 92x92 is needed.
especially when power is truely dictated by the turbo.
stratton.
truth, im trying to keep this as simple as possible
Originally Posted by Raceworx oh yeah i know its complete overkill but sometimes some of the best stuff is overkill..
you could mate it to a beefed up 6speed.. would be great to see one of the worlds first FWD 1000BHP SR20's iv seen a few FWC K's pushing 1000+ there pointless get no traction and break every five minuits but there nice bits of shinney to look at..
it would just be a "because i can" motor not a "we need the power" one
this is going in a full weight p11. Im just going to try to make the most efficient numbers i can.
Originally Posted by jpsr20det apologies to the late responce... 0-60 no idea probably under 5 seg with good traccion( not the case here 1 and 2 gear with traccion)...top speed I havent tested yet.
and update with the tune.
18lbs