data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a57/45a57bdb074e07877ddbbc71b5e016a904b7f2be" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9426/a9426fccfbf13fbe7bc623a9f2cafa00367b5e50" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7659b/7659bb795e16e0bf0ef01ead4a400dd71398ece3" alt=""
^Of course it's not a tri-y.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9426/a9426fccfbf13fbe7bc623a9f2cafa00367b5e50" alt=""
that header looks really really long for a 4-1
^It is to long.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9426/a9426fccfbf13fbe7bc623a9f2cafa00367b5e50" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7659b/7659bb795e16e0bf0ef01ead4a400dd71398ece3" alt=""
for 99% of the engines on this forum a tri-y is by far the best option
What has this tri-y header done on a ITB 2.0L VE setup? Answer that question, then it will be relevant because in my eyes I would take the ASP budget header over the tri-y. Budget header made 260whp, so it's proven. Also, I would take the triple stepped over both of those.
B18 tri -y its triple stepped
Big tube B18 tri y is better but more expensive
I bet that the B18 big tube will kill the ASP budget!!
B18 regular tube its pretty similar to ASP budget but B18 its triple stepped