Thread: tri -y headers

And the Mazworx header didn't do to well on the dyno on Cory's 2.3L

that's ^^^^ a 4-1 not a tri-y

Some one dyno it against a tri-y

that header looks really really long for a 4-1

I want to see this tri-y put down.

for 99% of the engines on this forum a tri-y is by far the best option

Yeess thats true

^Of course it's not a tri-y.



^It is to long.



What has this tri-y header done on a ITB 2.0L VE setup? Answer that question, then it will be relevant because in my eyes I would take the ASP budget header over the tri-y. Budget header made 260whp, so it's proven. Also, I would take the asp triple stepped over both of those.

well he did say 99% so for the 1% crowd that runs itbs theres a place for u..... until it gets mated to a set a itbs.

I'll wait to hear his reply since I asked him the question. The budget header is proven on a stock manifold as well bc I'm running one. I was just curious how the tri-y would do on a ITB setup to see if it had some choke points that might rob some power. That didn't seem to be the case on a budget header, but like my post from #296 said, it just reminds me of the Mazworx header.