meaning that i dont have a ve,like the OP does
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9426/a9426fccfbf13fbe7bc623a9f2cafa00367b5e50" alt=""
Originally Posted by
danmartin
Did you look at the figures on the last page, the 4-1 is obviously superior.yes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9426/a9426fccfbf13fbe7bc623a9f2cafa00367b5e50" alt=""
Originally Posted by
nickThe Tri y beat the 4-1 in the midrange he was just saying he'd rather have that.
I don't think it was obviously superior I think there is F*ck all in it really but i'd probably take the tri y too was better than the 4-1 upto 7k
upto 7k tri y has more midrange,and from 7k+ ,the 4 to 1 has it beat, and price would be differnt as well no?
Dyno Data: Stock vs. Tri-Y 4-Into-1 (Horsepower)
RPM STOCK TRI-Y 4:1
4,000 84 84 85
4,500 101 101 101
5,000 115 116 114
5,500 137 138 134
6,000 150 151 150
6,500 165 167 167
7,000 181 184 185
7,200 191 193 196
7,500 194 199 202
7,700 195 201 204
8,000 191 196 198
8,500 186 192 193