Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Time to dispel some of the crap

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 11-20 of 45
2009-11-16 21:01:05
#11
Originally Posted by Autech
Nice pic work.


The N1 head was cleaned up like this before assembly, and this is why the N1 intake manfiold was used to suit it. Which is also why many people dont gain using an N1 intake manfiold on the standard VE head.



makes me more happy that i have a true n1 head then
2009-11-16 22:08:20
#12
I know my limitations on funding and therefor wont be inquiring as to cost of work to have it done or numbers involved, gain potential etc. Its pretty simple to understand the benefit just based on the physical improvement demonstrated in the images. My question is in regards to what you used tool wise to achieve this. Ive got a bit of machining experience and would much rather buy a head, give this a go myself and see what i can come up with. If its easier PM me some info. Would be much appreciated.
2009-11-17 01:54:45
#13
no PMs all info on the table....
2009-11-17 02:14:19
#14
Originally Posted by 5speed
Very nice work, but beside all the pretty pictures do you have any concrete numbers to back up your opinion on the port velocity.

What kind of speed are you seeing with the pilot probe?

What's the cfm before and after porting?

Any dyno numbers?

Remember the low intake velocity idea was based on most of the VEs making peak power around 7,500. Of course the port velocity will be higher if you spin it up to 9,000. What was too slow for 7,500 is now too fast for 9,000.



I would also like HKS Danny to chime on this. His answers are always interesting.


I can can see why the velocity theory has come up. As at high rpm the ex will simply not keep up with the intake.

Dyno number will be a while. I will post up flow data when the head is 100% done. There will be before and after.

Originally Posted by mirrortints
Awaiting post on exhaust ports...LOL

After you mentioned the exhaust ports in another thread, I checked mine out while the head was off. WOW! Intake (for being stock) seems pretty smooth, exhaust on the other hand...YIKES!


Yeah they are just terrible. A lot of time went into reshaping them a lot more than the pics will be able to show.
2009-11-17 03:26:02
#15
What valves are you using with this head?
Im fascinated. Can i subscribe to your newsletter?
2009-11-17 04:36:56
#16
I remember when I pulled apart a head about 2 years ago and saw all the flaws from factory, I was able to smooth out a lot of the uglies, never got to dyno but the car felt different on the top side big +
2009-11-18 23:53:12
#17
Thanks for sharing the info, I can't wait to see some of the flow charts (I don't really care much for the dno chart as they normally end in fights) But if you do post the flow charts can you post port velocities too?
2009-11-18 23:59:04
#18
Originally Posted by nick
Thanks for sharing the info, I can't wait to see some of the flow charts (I don't really care much for the dno chart as they normally end in fights) But if you do post the flow charts can you post port velocities too?


x2 on that i would like to see the flow charts.
2009-11-19 00:42:43
#19
I ended with this combustion chamber:


It's a 20V modified CC. What do you think about this?
2009-11-19 11:59:27
#20
Good informative post.
Have to tried some mix fuels guys? with high comp pistons on a stock n1 cams? example e85 or q16 mix with pump gas?
Thanks.
Regards.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top