Thread: 2.0 VE vs DE rods?

+ Reply To Thread

First

Posts: 11-17 of 17

Search Thread

2009-10-29 02:02:02

#11

P10FTW

Take Action, Not Theory

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,903
Trader Score: 6 (100%)

SR16 rods are not the same. They are longer to compensate for the shorter stroke.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

R.I.P. Danilo216WHP/152TQ All Motor E85 Hi-Comp+N1's

'00 P11 - Stock 190k RR, 57Trim 14PSI, 860HKS Topfeed inj, Emanage Blue, Bigass FMIC

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-29 02:05:48

#12

lynchfourtwenty Online/offline status of lynchfourtwenty is unknown

SR20VE-T Boost Junky!

Join Date: 2008-09-27
Location: Washougal, Washington
Posts: 9,940
Trader Score: 17 (100%)

Originally Posted by P10FTW

SR16 rods are not the same. They are longer to compensate for the shorter stroke.

yep, went back and re-read the thread i thought i had seen it in an your right.. My bad

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

My Car Thread http://www.sr20-forum.com/members-rides/15788-lynchs-ve-se-r-project-thread.html
My Turbo Thread http://www.sr20-forum.com/turbo/50178-lynch-s-ve-t-thread.html

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-29 21:09:06

#13

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Originally Posted by buickpower

not saying their not the same. i have no clue about this engines .but just because a engine has the same stroke does not mean the rods are the same size.

when the cranks and pistons are interchangable, and the deck height is the same.... yes the lengths must be same

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-29 21:10:03

#14

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

Originally Posted by lynchfourtwenty

ya but we're talkin SR bottom end to SR bottom end.. everything i've read says they're the same, i believe the 16's are the same also, so you could get a sr16 an put a 2.0 crank in an then you would have a 2.0.. "i believe"

the stroke is only 68 on the sr16, so no, the rods are much longer.

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-30 00:25:11

#15

lynchfourtwenty Online/offline status of lynchfourtwenty is unknown

SR20VE-T Boost Junky!

Join Date: 2008-09-27
Location: Washougal, Washington
Posts: 9,940
Trader Score: 17 (100%)

Originally Posted by cory

the stroke is only 68 on the sr16, so no, the rods are much longer.

ya i realize that now :P

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

My Car Thread http://www.sr20-forum.com/members-rides/15788-lynchs-ve-se-r-project-thread.html
My Turbo Thread http://www.sr20-forum.com/turbo/50178-lynch-s-ve-t-thread.html

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-30 01:07:10

#16

buickpower Online/offline status of buickpower is unknown

Member

Join Date: 2009-10-27
Location:
Posts: 52
Trader Score: 0 (0%)

Originally Posted by cory

when the cranks and pistons are interchangable, and the deck height is the same.... yes the lengths must be same[/QUO

so u are saying the compression height of these pistons are the same.?

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

Reply Reply With Quote

2009-10-30 20:43:12

#17

cory

Member

Join Date: 2007-12-11
Location:
Posts: 2,903
Trader Score: 4 (100%)

compression height was not the question. he was asking if there was a diff between the length of the rods. all im saying is the rods them selves are the same length.....

0 Likes

Be the first to like this post.

2.0 218/153- 12.9@106
2.3 270/190- 11.6@116
2.4 285/210- 11.5@118
Retired...

Reply Reply With Quote

First

+ Reply To Thread

Thread Information

There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
StubUserName