Originally Posted by
nickThey are factory profiles whats to prove?
Your not going to make more power than N1's because they have n1 high lobes.
Youre just going to make more midrange because they have bigger low lobes than n1's. You'll be faster as a result because you'll have more area under the curve. You wouldn't replace your n1's with these I don't think it's be worth it but if you were upgrading your cams then yeah definitely consider these over n1's
TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTALLY agreeing with you there!
These HAVE been tested, these run EVERYDAY in a few cars around the World, as either N1's or 20V cams; where does the 'testing' need to be done?
EVLNXR had a set, which are still in his old car, and the new owner is very happy with them.
I run a set of N1s in my car, and I like them; more area under the graph and increased low down performance would be FANTASTIC, thank you very much!
These look like the solution.
I'm unsure if they are a 'drop in' solution; each cam should really be shimmed for optimum performance anyways.
This is looking like another example of why manufacturers can't be assed with the VE, and the community.
I feel sorry for Charles, possibly his own doing, but he had the best intentions and all credit to him for TRYING!
And here's yet ANOTHER manufacturer giving you, possibly, exactly what YOU want, but you'd rather 'wait for dyno figures'.
Personally I can't see any other cam manufacturer bothering with the VE; it's an OLD motor now, it missed it's opportunity to shine, and other marques have stepped up, and the 'community' are a bunch of noses pressed against the glass; waiting for the golden ticket to be delivered free of charge into their hands.
Guess what guys, the boat might just be setting sail, and you might have just missed it...