Originally Posted by jonwepa Yelp! I really don't want to change my springs and retainers and I don't need to rev to 9k to make 200whp, it can also be made at 8k too
oh and I grabbed them for 200 shipped
^Nice find, but I thought you could run the N1's on stock s/r's and rev to 8-8.5 with no problem. You could get away with running stock r's and run BC springs which go for like $75 or so and you would be set, but you got a good deal on your cams.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
1993 SE-R | 2.0L Full bolt-on setup | 2.3L VE up next | 2015 Q50-S | 3.7L The Sunday car | 2003 Kia Rio-cinco | 1.6L gas saving daily driver |
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R NA is a thinking man's game, alot of people dont have the stomach to play NA.
Actually the regular sr16's ramp angle is much steeper, which actually come with a slightly stiffer spring than the N1's. So in theory, with the same stock springs, the N1's would be a safer cam profile to run, even if only revving to 8k since at that point your header and intake would be the restriction and it wouldn't make any more power past about 77-7800 with your setup. Sr16's are much cheaper and you did get a good deal.
Originally Posted by totaled200ser Actually the regular sr16's ramp angle is much steeper, which actually come with a slightly stiffer spring than the N1's. So in theory, with the same stock springs, the N1's would be a safer cam profile to run, even if only revving to 8k since at that point your header and intake would be the restriction and it wouldn't make any more power past about 77-7800 with setup. Sr16's are much cheaper and you did get a good deal.
^That's what I was thinking, but I wasn't 100% sure on it.
0 Likes
Be the first to like this post.
1993 SE-R | 2.0L Full bolt-on setup | 2.3L VE up next | 2015 Q50-S | 3.7L The Sunday car | 2003 Kia Rio-cinco | 1.6L gas saving daily driver |
Originally Posted by SR20GTi-R NA is a thinking man's game, alot of people dont have the stomach to play NA.