Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: sr25ve ... ? random thoughts/benchbuilding..

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 30
2009-05-04 21:16:46
#21
So I can run 92mm bore with 86mm stroke with just boring the the block and putting in sleeves, on a high revving 11:1 DE motor without issues thus giving me a Engine Displacement of 2.3 and Engine Displacement (CC) of 2286.8. A Tuner in my area had told me no to run 92mm pistons but instead run 90mm but I don't remember why. Any ideas.
2009-05-05 13:00:14
#22
Originally Posted by kesi24
Franklins ? Jamal car is a daily driver its his only car!


^Wow, Jamal drive that think every day? Maybe he just had it setup like he did for the convention. It sound "supa mean-"
2009-05-05 15:52:01
#23
Originally Posted by kesi24
Franklins ? Jamal car is a daily driver its his only car!


^Oops! I meant Kelford like you said. Your PM box is full. I have question about those.
2009-05-05 16:03:11
#24
Originally Posted by snickers
I've been tellin everyone for over 3 YEARS! that you can do an easy 2.3 or 2.4L with a 92mm bore.


Using Ben's formula:

(3.14/4) x (92 x 92) x 86 x 4 = 2,300,176.64 somethings

So using a 92mm bore with a stock SR20 crank will yield a 2.3L, right?
2009-05-05 16:19:01
#25
Originally Posted by happynole
Using Ben's formula:

(3.14/4) x (92 x 92) x 86 x 4 = 2,300,176.64 somethings
Not somthings silly.

(no unit/no unit) x (mm x mm) x mm x no unit = mm³
So cubic millimeters. Also, using a better number for π (3.14159) gives me 2,286,775.93 mm³

There are 10mm in a cm and we have mm cubed so you need to divide by 10 three times. Or divide by 1,000 once.
That gives 2,286.78 cm³ (cc; cubic centimeters)

Originally Posted by happynole
So using a 92mm bore with a stock SR20 crank will yield a 2.3L, right?
Yes. 2.287 liters or so.
2009-05-05 16:46:58
#26
Originally Posted by happynole
Using Ben's formula:

(3.14/4) x (92 x 92) x 86 x 4 = 2,300,176.64 somethings

So using a 92mm bore with a stock SR20 crank will yield a 2.3L, right?


and this is safe for a high revving SR20de?
2009-05-05 16:49:55
#27
reedom...sin mek over 240whp....do what u need to do son....
2009-05-05 19:45:28
#28
Originally Posted by BenFenner
Not somthings silly.

(no unit/no unit) x (mm x mm) x mm x no unit = mm³
So cubic millimeters. Also, using a better number for π (3.14159) gives me 2,286,775.93 mm³

There are 10mm in a cm and we have mm cubed so you need to divide by 10 three times. Or divide by 1,000 once.
That gives 2,286.78 cm³ (cc; cubic centimeters)

2.287 liters or so.

See, I knowed it was SOMETHING

Thanks for the formula and the explaination.
2009-05-05 19:53:36
#29
Originally Posted by THOR
reedom...sin mek over 240whp....do what u need to do son....


When did this happen?
2009-05-05 19:57:26
#30
was this achieved Naturally Aspirated. dont say so unless you know these are facts you know. no here seh bull**** from wheelsjamaica. If is hear seh, then mek me know seh is here seh.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top