Thread: ASP Budget Headers on B13/N14 Chassis

^^^Reese, You are full of it!................Info that is.LOL

I was using a Jwt Ecu at the time. No setting was changed except for the header. I am kind of curious now. Did anyone use the header with the de engine that has dyno results? Not trying to start a big argument here I am just curious about the Tq down low thats all.

- BC2's with stock cam gears = No low end torque. His dyno had stock cams, so the stock cams, plus budget header combo must have worked out for his motor.

Stock ECUs eat timing as long as you feed it the right gas.

JWT ECUs need it at 15*. I highly recommend listening to them.

As MR mentioned, BC Stage 2s have low, low-end but quality high end. (unless you get some gears, or even an exhaust cam with some longer duration!)

I had the cams installed prior to the asp header install. Matter of fact they were in the car when the ssac header was installed. The only change was the headers. The car was spinning the tires at a lower rpm down low even with the bc2's installed. Lets just say I like to front wheel drift alot. I was expecting to do it alot easier with the budget header installed.

you like to understeer alot?? lol sounds like a curb hitting good time!

just looking at the long runners on the ASP its pretty obvious its built for top end powers, escpecially when you have it next to an SSAC..

and yet it made no more top end power on my car

^ compared to the x-force header?

SOTP for me going from SSAC to ASP there is a noticable difference