Originally Posted by suckit
You can do a google search on it and many links will show others confirming it. Its just a fact that it reads high. Its just like if you dynoed at Jeff Evans dyno dynamic I wouldve said its known to read low, its nothing personal or hating involved.
You can do a google search on it and many links will show others confirming it. Its just a fact that it reads high. Its just like if you dynoed at Jeff Evans dyno dynamic I wouldve said its known to read low, its nothing personal or hating involved.
Suckit, what is your point?
Let me break it down for you.
Take my dynapack number and only compare it to other people dynpacks numbers.
Take a dyno jet # and only compare it to other dyno jet #s.
Take a dyno dynamics # and only compare it to other dyno dynamic #s.
Take a mustang dyno # and only compare that to other mustang dyno #s.
Don’t try compare apples to oranges.
What do you really know about Churchs' dynos? Any first hand experience? It a rhetorical question because I know you don't.
The shop has two dynapacks, a 2000 and 4000 model. The 4000 model is internet rumoured to be +20 hp over a dynojet and the 2000 +10 over a dyno jet. When I got to the shop I insisted on making my runs on the 4000 but it was already occupied by the turbo S2000. Just imagine what would happen if I had a crack at that dyno. People heads would blow up.
Shawn Church told me my car would probably make 205 SAE on a dynojet. That to me is very accurate because I already made 191 SAE with an old tune and when I was running on one lean cylinder due to a bad injector.