Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Not bad for $100 header

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 82
2009-03-16 16:57:23
#21
E60 MAF FTW! That is the 95-99 maf, not the n60's. They still work well though.
2009-03-16 17:10:45
#22
Originally Posted by Andreas
5speed the cams need to be swithced at about 6200 RPMs to get rid of that dip.

You will make more power from 5600-6200 RPMs one you do so.


Thor, we have something to talk about, dont we. do you have something to tell me.

I am going VE sir.
2009-03-16 17:17:06
#23
hahahahahahahahah............ i think u already kno cuz....lookin for the n1s now.....200+ here i come
2009-03-16 17:34:21
#24
for sure
2009-03-16 18:08:13
#25
Regardless of the dyno discrepency, nice numbers! Especially with your poor motor being choked the way it is!

I was actually considering taking my car to Church's dyno, but have been contemplating whether to do so or not because I think I'd feel a bit more comfortable taking it to someone who even knows what a VE is! Especially because I need some tuning done.
2009-03-16 19:12:02
#26
Originally Posted by SE-Rio
Regardless of the dyno discrepency, nice numbers! Especially with your poor motor being choked the way it is!

I was actually considering taking my car to Church's dyno, but have been contemplating whether to do so or not because I think I'd feel a bit more comfortable taking it to someone who even knows what a VE is! Especially because I need some tuning done.



Gino, do us all a favor and dyno your car at Church, and we will see how legit my numbers are.

Calling all VEs’ in Socal, see if you can come close to my numbers.

Well, I knew before I posted there would be haters. Like I said early in another post, everybody bench race on the internet. You don’t see me complaining, hating when people were posting numbers with correction factors (actual, standard, shoot out mode) favorable for high numbers. My numbers are in SAE.

Don’t you guys feel like our forum is getting too commercialize. Where only certain members are allow their opinions and others less known members are shot down. I mean, we can’t have somebody that not with us make higher numbers (sarcasm).

These are the reasons why I have held off posting my dyno numbers, setup, expiences, and findings for awhile. Been around the VE for three year.
2009-03-16 19:19:25
#27
Originally Posted by SE-Rio
Regardless of the dyno discrepency, nice numbers! Especially with your poor motor being choked the way it is!


If you really study my setup, you will realize it was intentional. Intentional in that things were kept small and not because the engine is chocking.

Look at the torque curves on the low cams, they are higher than the big cams.
2009-03-16 19:20:12
#28
i like the cam combo
2009-03-16 19:36:36
#29
Good job Robert you going to Reggies dyno day on the 28th?
2009-03-16 20:37:49
#30
Originally Posted by 5speed

Well, I knew before I posted there would be haters. Like I said early in another post, everybody bench race on the internet. You don’t see me complaining, hating when people were posting numbers with correction factors (actual, standard, shoot out mode) favorable for high numbers. My numbers are in SAE.


You can do a google search on it and many links will show others confirming it. Its just a fact that it reads high. Its just like if you dynoed at Jeff Evans dyno dynamic I wouldve said its known to read low, its nothing personal or hating involved.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top