Originally Posted by Andreas
I am not talking about a SR20VE cam, I am talking about a SR20VE 20V cam.
I am not talking about a SR20VE cam, I am talking about a SR20VE 20V cam.
Really? I thought you were talking about the VET cam:
Originally Posted by Andreas
It was tested by Clark Steppler at JWT and lost power when they switched the exhaust cam to the high lobe and that is with VET cams on the intake and the exhaust.
It was tested by Clark Steppler at JWT and lost power when they switched the exhaust cam to the high lobe and that is with VET cams on the intake and the exhaust.
I understand that you've also remarked that the 20V cams would be preferable. But if it turns out that the VET's exhaust cam has the same high lobe as a 20V, but the better low lobe, then wouldn't that be the better option?
Originally Posted by Andreas
Also, you were running the low lobe on the exhaust side when did this test, So when you went to the standard VE cam which is bigger than the VET intake cam, you of course will make more HP.
Also, you were running the low lobe on the exhaust side when did this test, So when you went to the standard VE cam which is bigger than the VET intake cam, you of course will make more HP.
No I wasn't, as per my earlier post:
Originally Posted by more_fasterer
I've replaced the above exhaust rockers with some out of a VE, so the exhaust high lobe now actives. Hence the question in the original post
I've replaced the above exhaust rockers with some out of a VE, so the exhaust high lobe now actives. Hence the question in the original post
Originally Posted by Autech
The duration on the VET exhaust high cam looks extremely long. Too long for my personal liking of cams that ive seen. The ramprate by eye is huge, almost a complete drop, and if the rocker ratio still reflects this sort of valve behaviour - to me from my background of learning it wouldnt help with exhaust gas flow to keep the turbo spooling properly. It would be very on/off.
The duration on the VET exhaust high cam looks extremely long. Too long for my personal liking of cams that ive seen. The ramprate by eye is huge, almost a complete drop, and if the rocker ratio still reflects this sort of valve behaviour - to me from my background of learning it wouldnt help with exhaust gas flow to keep the turbo spooling properly. It would be very on/off.
Good stuff. That's the sort of thing that I simply can't tell with my current setup, as (a) there's no point revving past 6500 because there's no torque, and (b) the standard turbo spools so quickly anyway. If you're happy to send your cams away to be measured, then all the better