Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Budget Build

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 171-180 of 386
2009-02-25 14:07:12
#171
Originally Posted by bill
You have to admit it, Honda-Tech guy


Man, I wish I was cool enough to post on Honda-Tech I don't have an account so I just end up looking at Engloid's weld in the fab section : /
2009-02-25 14:07:56
#172
Originally Posted by Setzer
Why do you think it came with two sets of injectors?




Straight up. Yes.


^Do you have/know somebody using both sets?
2009-02-25 14:09:49
#173
Originally Posted by MR-4Door-SR20DE
^Do you have/know somebody using both sets?


Maybe, why? I'm not going to let all the secrets out in this thread now haha.
2009-02-25 14:17:59
#174
OK I got a question for everybody, what type of dyno should I go to before I post my #, because you never know with the development going on right now in our community it may be higher hen Jun # by 5-10 hp. So which type of dyno does everyone like to see what they call accurate # off of????????????
2009-02-25 14:22:00
#175
we can solve this issue so easily. All they gotta do is redyno the car on a different DYNO. I think the mustang dyno reads low and i dont know about a dynojet is there even one here in CT? Anyway what do u think this build would actually be making power wise? i believe he said they where gonna use a aem in a month and tune it again so they should put out #'s in a month if i read correctly.
2009-02-25 14:29:44
#176
My thing is I don't see what the problem is, the #s are there so if the type of dyno they are on reads higher or lower someone do the math and tell us what it is. The graph is right there to look at what's the problem?!?!?! Don't just call BS post the facts if you got em I tell you this if they can't straighten this out I'm not posting jack and it will be the SR20 communities lost. It would seem as we went forward we would do it together but it seems the only people who will really know anything about my car are those in whom I feel are really trying to do something, 230 whp! we should be going nuts instead we are fighting about the #. 230 is allot of hp man and we not using the formular to do more we fighting over the results, this is crazy!!
2009-02-25 14:30:14
#177
Originally Posted by Slow
OK I got a question for everybody, what type of dyno should I go to before I post my #, because you never know with the development going on right now in our community it may be higher hen Jun # by 5-10 hp. So which type of dyno does everyone like to see what they call accurate # off of????????????


Numbers are really only comparative to the same dyno in the same conditions. SAE correcting can only go so far.
2009-02-25 14:32:01
#178
Originally Posted by MAYIMBEZ
we can solve this issue so easily. All they gotta do is redyno the car on a different DYNO. I think the mustang dyno reads low and i dont know about a dynojet is there even one here in CT? Anyway what do u think this build would actually be making power wise? i believe he said they where gonna use a aem in a month and tune it again so they should put out #'s in a month if i read correctly.


The Mustang dyno at XX reads WAY low. No one wants to dyno on something that makes their car look crappy. AEM wont put out any better numbers since we have the same control with Calum's excellent Realtime boards.

Oh and there are a ton of dynojets in CT. Thing is they suck too.
2009-02-25 14:33:44
#179
Originally Posted by Slow
OK I got a question for everybody, what type of dyno should I go to before I post my #, because you never know with the development going on right now in our community it may be higher hen Jun # by 5-10 hp. So which type of dyno does everyone like to see what they call accurate # off of????????????


In my opinion there is nothing wrong with 90% of Juns Dyno.

I am 100% it made 168 Lb Ft Torque

but the Pyrimid between 7200-8000 RPMs says somthing is wrong there.

I am 100% sure the engine made 221 WHP.

If a SR20VE motor is done right 155-160 Lb Ft Torque is no problem.

12.5 to 1 compression and 1 mm over bore will be good for an xtra 8-10 Lb Ft Torque more.

The increase in compression from 10.3 - 12.5 to 1 is good for a 4-5 % increase in torque and HP.

4-5% of 160 Lb Ft torque is 6-9 more. Which 168 FT torque on his dyno.

the realy good 10.3 to 1 compression motors make 208-212 WHP 4-5% over that is 218-223 WHP.

So take out the Pyrimids from the graph which are anomolies and you got

221 WHP and 168 Ft Lb Torque.

I will have a photoshop up of what I am saying soon.

My flame suit is on so roast away.

I still think it is a good job.
2009-02-25 14:34:20
#180
Originally Posted by Slow
My thing is I don't see what the problem is, the #s are there so if the type of dyno they are on reads higher or lower someone do the math and tell us what it is. The graph is right there to look at what's the problem?!?!?! Don't just call BS post the facts if you got em I tell you this if they can't straighten this out I'm not posting jack and it will be the SR20 communities lost. It would seem as we went forward we would do it together but it seems the only people who will really know anything about my car are those in whom I feel are really trying to do something, 230 whp! we should be going nuts instead we are fighting about the #. 230 is allot of hp man and we not using the formular to do more we fighting over the results, this is crazy!!

The problem is that when the next guy with the same setup go to dyno will see 215whp.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top