I dont have the dyno sheet as the dudes printer was broken.
Here was Peters setup
Stock internal VE
N1 cams set at 0,0
n1 ported intake manifold and n1 throttle body
SSAC header 2.5 collector, 3" exhaust no cat
Gpsec 2 piece pullies
JWT lightweight flywheel
3" intake w/ jwt pop charger
e60 maf
Calum Realtime ECU tuned by me
The car made 196whp most likely due to the badly dented secondaries on the ssac header.
Car peaked power right at 7900 or 8k. Cant remember exactly. However the car still held over 180whp to 9000. These are facts.
So once again, to say it is pointless to shift at 9k when you would fall right back in the heart of the powerband is dumb. This has been proven on runs made back to back with my buddies turbo nx. He was shifting right at 8000-8200 and lost the race by a car length. I said what are you doing, shift at 9k and they rematched and the VE pulled 2 lengths on that same nx, basicly back to back runs. No difference other than shifting 1000 rpm later.
And again, even RB's graph, if you drop 2k rpm during any given shift, do the averages, wait i just did them myself.
Shifting at roughly 9k with a 2k rpm drop so average power from 7k-9k is 194.5 whp, while average whp from 6500-8500 accounting for that same drop is 192.6whp average. While minimal, its still a difference and numbers dont lie.
With shorter gearing yes that will change and 8500 could be your better shift point if say you only had a 1700 rpm drop between gears.
Again i know a stock trans is more than a 2k rpm drop as well. This is just doing averages. In that case the more of an rpm drop is more in my favor as the average will be worse because below 7k the numbers fall rapidly compared to after 8500.
If you really cant see that then well i dont know what to tell you. Ive been drag racing for a long time, both n/a cars and turbo and i can tell you in this case using that graph as an example, 8500 is too low to shift.
Here was Peters setup
Stock internal VE
N1 cams set at 0,0
n1 ported intake manifold and n1 throttle body
SSAC header 2.5 collector, 3" exhaust no cat
Gpsec 2 piece pullies
JWT lightweight flywheel
3" intake w/ jwt pop charger
e60 maf
Calum Realtime ECU tuned by me
The car made 196whp most likely due to the badly dented secondaries on the ssac header.
Car peaked power right at 7900 or 8k. Cant remember exactly. However the car still held over 180whp to 9000. These are facts.
So once again, to say it is pointless to shift at 9k when you would fall right back in the heart of the powerband is dumb. This has been proven on runs made back to back with my buddies turbo nx. He was shifting right at 8000-8200 and lost the race by a car length. I said what are you doing, shift at 9k and they rematched and the VE pulled 2 lengths on that same nx, basicly back to back runs. No difference other than shifting 1000 rpm later.
And again, even RB's graph, if you drop 2k rpm during any given shift, do the averages, wait i just did them myself.
Shifting at roughly 9k with a 2k rpm drop so average power from 7k-9k is 194.5 whp, while average whp from 6500-8500 accounting for that same drop is 192.6whp average. While minimal, its still a difference and numbers dont lie.
With shorter gearing yes that will change and 8500 could be your better shift point if say you only had a 1700 rpm drop between gears.
Again i know a stock trans is more than a 2k rpm drop as well. This is just doing averages. In that case the more of an rpm drop is more in my favor as the average will be worse because below 7k the numbers fall rapidly compared to after 8500.
If you really cant see that then well i dont know what to tell you. Ive been drag racing for a long time, both n/a cars and turbo and i can tell you in this case using that graph as an example, 8500 is too low to shift.