Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Thoughts on a full race motor setup

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 251-260 of 333
2011-11-04 02:30:47
#251
Ok since Miko's thread was pretty much thread jacked by 2.4 build failure and o-ringing blocks crap, how bout we continue this conversation here.

First ill start with all the 2.4 failures. Almost everyones motor that has failed has had different failures not choked up to one cause.

Strats broke a rod in half more than likely due to a seized bearing. Not much you could do there whether it was a problem with oil clearances, oil pressure problem, crank journal problems, overtorquing of the rod bolts, who knows. Its too hard to determine at this point without taking measurements of the broken parts and so on.

I believe two were having issues with coolant mixing with the oil. This has nothing to really do with the headgasket sealing. As long as the block was flat, the likely hood of any gasket whether it was a cometic or mazworx of allowing oil past the galleys all the way into the coolant passage is very very unlikely unless something got warped. Again not likely. The likelyhood of coolant mixing into the oil from a sleeved block is from the base of the sleeve itself. Either caused by improper machining of the base of the block, improperly sealed sleeve, or both together. The sleeves come with red loctite to completely smother the bottom of the sleeve just before pressing it into the block. If you dont use this, your asking for problems. The sleeves also have bevels at the bottom to again help seal in the base of the block. So coolant mixing is more than likely coolant leaking through the base of the sleeve into the crankcase. Again our oil galleys are quite seperated from the coolant galleys. You can have a blown headgasket around the cylinder wall causing your cooling system to pressurize and not have oil go into the coolant or coolant into the oil. Most of the time this doesnt happen unless again its overheated and warped or overheated to the point where you have a gasket breakdown which on a metal gasket is not really going to happen.

To those that are getting leaking past the gasket into the cooling system pressurizing it either from a bad gasket seal not enough head clamping force causing head lift and causing the gasket to blow or so on. This can also be caused by a sunken sleeve again due to improper installation.


Now onto o-ringing. There is nothing wrong with o-ringing a block. However each time you dissasemble it you have to replace the o-ring as well as the gasket. This helps in extremely high cylinder pressures more so for boosted engines than n/a. Even the big n/a k series guys dont use o-ring blocks. More this is found on 1000+whp turbo builds where you might get a bit of head lift under the extreme boost and cylinder pressures. The orings prevent the gasket from breaking during lift and prevent pressurizing of the cooling system. It gives you a lot of leway whereas if you just had the gasket and you lift the head even slightly your probably gonna blow the gasket and pressurize the cooling system.

There are two different o-rings used commonly. Copper o-ring which is the most common and again works very effectively. Then there is a stainless steel o-ring which doesnt have to be replaced but requires a recieving groove matched in the head. This crushes the gasket pushing it up into the recieving groove making an even tighter seal. Along with onto the block around the ring. You will see these on very big builds as well.

My take on on the 2.4 failures is not just one thing, its different for everyone and most of it comes down to improper installation. You look at cory's motor and a couple others that are still together rockin and rollin without issues. What did they do differently? For one i believe all of their blocks were mazworx blocks which cost them more but it was done properly. Dont reuse headgaskets when tearing them apart. And double check all your clearances, oil pressure, and so on that will help keep the motor together. It really does come down to assembly. Plain and simple. Hate me if you will but im saying this because its quite obvious.

So lets continue this discussion here.
2011-11-04 04:31:43
#252
Let me put an end to the "2.4 failure" b.s.

Like Ashton said, there is no one "problem".

All the following builds use/used Mazwork gasket. No re-use of this gasket is the only conclusion that can be drawn. Other than that the gasket is fine.

Cory 2.3/2.4:
Mazworx sleeved block/Mazworx 92mm crank
Status: Running/Rebuild
1. No problems so far besides a re used gasket that failed.
2. Making changes currently.

Stratton 2.4:
L.A Sleeves block/ ebay 92mm crank
Status: Down
1st failure: Tuning issue.
2nd failure: assembly or oiling failure (broken rod/hole in block)
No obvious sealing problem

Teal97 2.4:
Benson sleeved block/Mazworx 92mm crank
Status: Down
1.Benson does not sleeve their blocks properly. Sleeves drop causing sealing problem.
2. Excessive timing from 2L map and lean conditions killed rings and possibly head gasket. (low compression)

Re-spect 2.4 (2)
Benson sleeved block & CDP (CT) AEBS Sleeved block/ BC knifed 91mm crank
Status: Down & Parted out
1.Benson block dropped sleeve.
2. New block sleeved by CDP using AEBS sleeves. Ran great, made good power. coolant issues from re-used gasket from previous block. Parted out because hes getting married...smfh.

MrSentraSpecV 2.4:
Mazworx sleeved block/Mazworx 92mm crank
Status: Running/ out for changes to setup
1. Ran great, no cooling issues.
2. Bad differential bearing and wheel bearings affected recent performance.

Andreas Miko 2.3:
Mazworx/Darton sleeved block/91mm Tomei crank
Status: Down/rebuild
1. Shifted sleeve caused cooling issues.
2. New block in order.

SR20Gti-R 2.4/ 2.xx (new big build)
CDP AEBS sleeved blocks (2)/ Mazworx 92mm crank
Status: Assembled
1. Ran great, no cooling issues.
2. Lost power from end gap clearance issue. Machine work has been honored and motor is almost back in.
3. New 2.xx block is almost complete. Dyno/Specs soon.
Last edited by SR20GTi-R on 2011-11-04 at 18-59-04.
2011-11-04 04:38:25
#253
I thought Andreas had someone else sleeve his block other than Mazworxs the 1st time?
2011-11-04 04:41:52
#254
IIRC he had Darton do it...but that was way back via a different process than they use now..
2011-11-04 04:43:22
#255
Originally Posted by BlueRB240
I thought Andreas had someone else sleeve his block other than Mazworxs the 1st time?


Darton or a local I believe.

Mazworx bored/machined/inspected the block after it was sleeved.
2011-11-04 04:48:08
#256
I thought Andreas had someone else sleeve his block other than Mazworxs the 1st time?

^^^^ I think you might be correct (hence why the sleeve shifted)

EDIT: someone above beat me to it
2011-11-04 04:49:44
#257
Darton has changed their sleeving/machining process since he had his done...
2011-11-04 04:53:05
#258
So the two known running ones right now both using a mazworx done sleeved block and mazworx crank. Again someone mentioned that the cranks were all made by the same company but Mazworx sells them for almost twice the price as what they were going for on ebay. Again seems like something was off about that. Maybe the ones on ebay were a bad batch or not soo good quality batch. Who knows. All I know is mazworx has lived up to their reputation and I doubt they would sell something that wasnt checked and double checked and deemed good.

Again same goes for my buddies 2.2L build we did, Darton sleeves installed locally and the sleeves dropped due to doing the boring and honing without a torque plate. Sleeve lifted and they decked it. Ran good during breakin and after a couple wot pulls to redline during tuning no detonation present it started pressurizing the cooling system and overheating. Pulled it apart to find the sleeves dropped a good .014. Surprisingly the Mazworx headgasket was still sealing in two of the cylinders, lol. The mazworx gasket is a great gasket and probably the only way to go. I dont think the oem vet gasket has enough room to go from 86 to 92 and still leave the firing ring of the gasket in place to even seal. Maybe im wrong but ive seen them up close and it would be close but just cant see it happening.

So far using a new gasket has done just fine as long as the sleeves are good.

My suggestion if you dont want to spend tons of money on gaskets and crap to do upgrades, you might as well just do everything you want to do before you assemble the motor and be done with it other than changes that dont involve taking the head off. No need for "testing". Do what your going to do and do it right the first time and you probably wont be dissapointed.
2011-11-04 11:03:38
#259
Originally Posted by ashtonsser
So the two known running ones right now both using a mazworx done sleeved block and mazworx crank. Again someone mentioned that the cranks were all made by the same company but Mazworx sells them for almost twice the price as what they were going for on ebay. Again seems like something was off about that. Maybe the ones on ebay were a bad batch or not soo good quality batch. Who knows. All I know is mazworx has lived up to their reputation and I doubt they would sell something that wasnt checked and double checked and deemed good.

Again same goes for my buddies 2.2L build we did, Darton sleeves installed locally and the sleeves dropped due to doing the boring and honing without a torque plate. Sleeve lifted and they decked it. Ran good during breakin and after a couple wot pulls to redline during tuning no detonation present it started pressurizing the cooling system and overheating. Pulled it apart to find the sleeves dropped a good .014. Surprisingly the Mazworx headgasket was still sealing in two of the cylinders, lol. The mazworx gasket is a great gasket and probably the only way to go. I dont think the oem vet gasket has enough room to go from 86 to 92 and still leave the firing ring of the gasket in place to even seal. Maybe im wrong but ive seen them up close and it would be close but just cant see it happening.

So far using a new gasket has done just fine as long as the sleeves are good.

My suggestion if you dont want to spend tons of money on gaskets and crap to do upgrades, you might as well just do everything you want to do before you assemble the motor and be done with it other than changes that dont involve taking the head off. No need for "testing". Do what your going to do and do it right the first time and you probably wont be dissapointed.


There is no "right" when it comes to these motors.

Heres a few things to highlight:

1.This is all new territory and testing different piston/head/valve combos are the reason why the heads have been coming off. If there was a "do it right" we all would not have our motors out right now

2.Right now the motors 4 motors that run are all off the road and apart because we each made some changes.

3.The mazworx crank/block is not the only combo that works, if you read what I wrote earlier. Different setups were taken apart for other reasons

4.The AEBS sleeves are twice the thickness and a much more solid sleeve. A little more expensive but works great along side the Mazworx.
Last edited by SR20GTi-R on 2011-11-04 at 14-49-43.
2011-11-04 12:04:52
#260
My block is not a big bore block but it was sleeved by Mazworx with zero issues. The stock sleeves got damaged so I let them do it. Over a year and still going strong. They do a good job at sleeving.
Now back to the big bore stuff.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top