Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Thoughts on a full race motor setup

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 81-90 of 333
2008-12-01 21:48:05
#81
Originally Posted by mrslappy

the 3 highest HP DET/VET setups I have seen all used factory Intake manifolds. Ported, reworked or indifferent, these motors all made 600+whp and 450+tq at "low" boost levels. 2 of these motors actually made more power than similar K/B series honda setups with similar parts, same turbo and displacement.


Factory SR20VE, or factory N1? How good would the N1 be?
2008-12-01 22:05:34
#82
Originally Posted by mrslappy


the biggest power gains that I have seen with these motors is with the header design, the collector megaphone used and also the quality of the header built and they way it is built. the other aspect is tuning. Someone mentioned how the VE's like a lot of timing.... If you are adding a lot of ignition timing to gain power, then you are not running a very efficient setup. the more ignition timing needed means that you are not achieving a high cylinder fill because the more air/fuel in the cylinder at a higher pressure means that the A/F burns at a faster rate. If you have a very efficient setup with the proper cam timing and proper header you will be running much less ignition timing. If you are running 34-38 deg timing at 7-8000rpm like some people have stated then you are not making anywhere near what your motor should be making if you had the proper header.... N1 cams set at the "proper" cam specs and a tuned length header ( less than 30" with megaphone/reverse cone) will want less than 30 deg timing to make the most power....


I tried to bring this up months ago and was ignored. A very valid point, that should be giving everyone a clue as to how this block/head is responding to our most "popular" parts right now.

Subscribed.

Dudeman
2008-12-01 22:26:13
#83
Originally Posted by mrslappy


SERacer, are you asking about the ignition timing? or do you want more info in general on that subject? I can tell you that a few of the 2.0L motors with the correct cam timing and header design use about 24-25 deg advance at 8000rpm and these motors can generally be ran on 87 octane with no changes, except a loss in power, but no detonation. These make about 156-158tq at the wheels


I know this was always a band aid for power, like you said we are lazy and the shortcut/quick fix has become the normal thing to do. The younger guys pick up on this and think that's the way it should be when it is not.

I Put the N1 cams in my car without tuning (shame on me ran out of time) and was busy watching the gages instead of driving.
1 loud
2 cam settings did +3 -3 on the sprockets and timing was around 15* static with a race JWt ecu
3 power was there but mostly top end 4 gear between 7k and 8k fuel cut.

N1 will work for me when it's tuned.
2008-12-01 22:57:35
#84
Originally Posted by SERacer
Originally Posted by mrslappy

The N1 cams are not designed for a 2.0L motor and thus the opening/closing ramps and centerlines are designed around a 68.7mm stroke with a 2.10 R/S ratio and with less displacement these cams are not anywhere near optimized for a 2.0L motor. these are designed around the VE head though as the 1.6 and 2.0 heads are the same casting and have the same/similar flow properties.
QUOTE]

Based on the above, take a look at this and tell me what you think.
While you guys were discussing this thread. I was out racing.
YouTube - Tky Trot 08 ed..wmv


That lil swift GT is quick. Are you poping the cams at the same time? or spacing them out?
2008-12-01 23:13:02
#85
They both come on at the same time. 5600rpm in qualifying. Then turned them down to 5200 which worked much better. The JWt ecu compensated well. I was concerned it would run lean. Which it did but nothing to be worried about,

More. http://www.sr20-forum.com/road-racing/12452-sebring-lc-tky-trot-vvl-power-new-post.html
2008-12-02 02:37:07
#86
This thread is getting interesting.

Subscribed.

btw...I believe charles will be selling some of his manifolds soon.
2008-12-02 04:20:04
#87
Back to the NA topic, I do want to get more into the development of the sr20ve motor more as the honda and toyota stuff is getting kinda boring... same parts, same motors same stuff nothing super cool... I think that some of you should do some 2.3-2.4L motor builds and get some good solid head work done and have it all ready for some big cams when they finally come out. I was pointed to a company called mazworx and i see they have a nice head gasket that looks very strong similar to the Greddy and Apex ones. There are also some simple easy piston and con rod tweaks you can do to make a lot more power instead of just cams and port work.

I will be waiting for that day as im going that route with my build
2008-12-02 04:40:35
#88
Originally Posted by SERacer
Originally Posted by mrslappy

The N1 cams are not designed for a 2.0L motor and thus the opening/closing ramps and centerlines are designed around a 68.7mm stroke with a 2.10 R/S ratio and with less displacement these cams are not anywhere near optimized for a 2.0L motor. these are designed around the VE head though as the 1.6 and 2.0 heads are the same casting and have the same/similar flow properties.
QUOTE]

Based on the above, take a look at this and tell me what you think.
While you guys were discussing this thread. I was out racing.
YouTube - Tky Trot 08 ed..wmv


there is no way that the motor in that swift gt or be it a gti is a suzuki powerplant let alone the 1.3 that comes in that car.

what motor was in that swift ?

car sounds great by the way !

stratton.
2008-12-02 11:40:43
#89
Originally Posted by STRATTON
Originally Posted by SERacer


there is no way that the motor in that swift gt or be it a gti is a suzuki powerplant let alone the 1.3 that comes in that car.

what motor was in that swift ?

car sounds great by the way !

stratton.


It's in F production class. whicn means 1.3 motor. I helped build 1.3 motors with 175chp and 13:1 Cosworth pistons and Suzuki ported big valve heads. long ago.
Light weight, slicks, good setup. good driver = good results. That is a great example why we need to put our heads together to have good results of our own.

Thank you, my ears a re still ringing.
2008-12-02 12:26:38
#90
Originally Posted by SERacer
Originally Posted by STRATTON


It's in F production class. whicn means 1.3 motor. I helped build 1.3 motors with 175chp and 13:1 Cosworth pistons and Suzuki ported big valve heads. long ago.


lol maybe he's running a busa motor....
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top