I've talked myself into a circle and may just have to take my words back and put my foot in my mouth. Ignore me for now.
The definition of "engine load" seems to be the crux of the issue. I'm starting to feel that it is an outdated, nebulous term with no real definition. It seems to most closely describe cylinder filling or maybe just torque? It isn't clear to me what it means anymore, but I can't argue one way or another about it without a good definition. And if it does describe cylinder filling or torque, then "MAF load" isn't such a horrible name as long as "MAF load" refers to an estimation of load using MAF combined with RPM or similar, not just straight MAF data.
The definition of "engine load" seems to be the crux of the issue. I'm starting to feel that it is an outdated, nebulous term with no real definition. It seems to most closely describe cylinder filling or maybe just torque? It isn't clear to me what it means anymore, but I can't argue one way or another about it without a good definition. And if it does describe cylinder filling or torque, then "MAF load" isn't such a horrible name as long as "MAF load" refers to an estimation of load using MAF combined with RPM or similar, not just straight MAF data.
Last edited by BenFenner
on 2013-05-31
at 16-44-23.