Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Tuning for Gas Mileage

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 115
2009-07-31 16:27:43
#31
Where do you guys keep your tire PSI at?
2009-07-31 16:46:36
#32
Originally Posted by kneesmO
Where do you guys keep your tire PSI at?


I haven't checked mine in a bit, but when I go on a road trip at 35-40. Usually just 35 to be safe if I have to drive on a hot day.

This is for front and back, car seems to drive much smoother too
2009-08-01 00:53:15
#33
Fuel Map Tuning
Here is the latest update on Fuel Map tuning, with no timing udpates. Now I do realize I don't have a good base to start with. But that will change when I go on the trip next week, I will have more constant numbers.

Miles Driven: 19.0
Gallons Fueled Up: 1.197
MPG: 15.87

All City driving, stop and go, stop lights. Stepped on the gas about 3-4 times, not always to red. Other then that regular driving.

This is exactly what Ben was saying, fuel maps alone don't seem to do the trick. It doesn't help that while in closed loop, the wideband didn't show numbers that were actually on the fuel map.

I think for this to make a difference, I may need to set the fuel maps to 17:1 A/F and then it should probably be around 15-16 in real life.

2009-08-01 02:55:34
#34
the nissan ecu isnt going to let you run leaner than 14.7 in closed loop unless you can some how trick it with o2 sensor voltage manipulation. with my b13 i used values that would be 18.0 and down to 13.0 afr and still got mid 14's. this is the limit of the narrow band o2 sensor. you are going to have to tune timing with the stock ecu to try and get better mpg. or even better yet your right foot and timing lol.
2009-08-01 02:59:01
#35
Yeah that's what it's beginning to look like. I might just install back my burned up O2 sensor, since it allowed me to achieve 16's.

The right foot, eh that's a hard one. The idea here is to get the best possible MPG while leaving the car fun to drive, and still driving it like fun. It wont get me 50mpg, but getting it up to 35mpg highway from 27 would definitely be nice.
2009-08-01 03:12:50
#36
My A/F ratio is much lower than yours (no exact number but it is rich at all rpms) but my timing map is great because I get about 20mpg mixed city/highway, romping on the throttle often. My trip mileage is about 25-28mpg. Setup is in my sig. I can send you my tune to look at if you want.
2009-08-01 03:27:56
#37
Sure! Your setup looks fairly similar to mine, sending you PM with email.
2009-08-01 05:18:32
#38
Here is another quote that further proves BenFenner's theory as being correct.

Fuel saving - a professional engineer's view

Adding 10 or 20% more torque / power to a turbocharged engine (petrol or diesel) is relatively simple, and there is no question that these upgrades do approximately what they say. As a result, the engine may be able to cope with a particular driving situation in a gear one higher than is normal (say fourth rather than third). This means the engine runs more slowly, and so there is less power wasted in friction. The principle of using very "tall" gearing for better economy is well understood and indeed can be seen in many of today's 6-speed vehicles.

Generally the engine's combustion efficiency will be worse at full power, since both petrol and diesel engines "over-fuel" to some extent at full load and so some fuel is wasted. But the friction reduction effect will normally more than compensate for this and so overall the economy will be better.



Another link: http://www.fuelsaving.info/vehicle.htm
One principle applicable to both diesel and petrol is downsizing - if you can get more power and torque from a given size of engine, then you can use a smaller engine for the same performance, and so improve economy. So for example if you make a 1.4 litre engine as powerful as a typical 1.6, then it will generally give better economy than the 1.6. Technologies such as turbocharging and VVT are fundamentally performance improvements, but can give better economy as a side-effect.
2009-08-01 09:29:45
#39
what parameters are you using to tune your timing? knock sensor? what are you using to gauge a threshold for timing?
2009-08-01 15:09:45
#40
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
what parameters are you using to tune your timing? knock sensor? what are you using to gauge a threshold for timing?


Nothing yet, I can try using NissTune, I think I saw a feature for knock detection, if it even works on our cars.

I'm not going to do anything crazy, I'm thinking a 2 degree advance across the map, and seeing if it does better then 15mpg city haha.

Now before I installed the Fidanza flywheel, 6 puck clutch, stopped using MT90 (didn't have time to wait for it), and went blow through, I think I used to get 18-20 city...

Highway stayed the same original turbo setup vs what I currently have. In fact I think highway went up 1 mpg
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top