Thread: NismoTronic Tuning Software for TunerCode

Absolutely. I mentioned supporting the LC1/LM1/LM2 direct logging and you can also run any 0-5 volt wideband output to the ECU with a voltage divider.

I have a wideband selection in the settings window which will allow you to populate the Lambda table with your logged a/f values.

I have a custom wideband offset which will allow you to add any wideband that isn't already on the drop down list.

Oh man that's awesome. I'm on the edge of buying an LC-1, my UEGO is more expensive and is far more useless. Not being able to data log AFR's and street tuning sucks big time .

Yea, the LC-1 has the capability of logging via LogWorks and just about any tuning program. You can't beat that!

Also here is another picture of the graphing, just showing some of the things you can do with it. You can keep the background a solid color as well, i just didn't do one in this example.

Notice the second graph still shows the MAF and ECT values in the header, but the graph is no longer drawn. This is because I set the max to 0 so it hides the graph from being drawn!

Vadim,
I explained in detail how you can log AFR with TunerCode. Why don't you use that?

Dave

What about comparing different graphs side by side? Since you have multiple graphs it shouldn't be too hard interface wise .




My car is not running yet, so I have time to think over the best method for the wideband. I recently decided to put the B14 RT ECU into the NA daily. Thus will be using the UEGO in there. But am going to go with the LC-1, since it can do narrow band too, thus eliminating the need for a front O2 sensor together. Plus UEGO doesn't fit in my gauge stack (since it has a thicker plastic that goes around the gauge).

If it wasn't for all of that I would hook it up directly to TunerPro via TunerCode once I got the car running.

I am not sure exactly what putting the graphs side by side would give you as far as comparison's sake is concerned.

I think stacking them and being able to sift through all of the graphs in unison by clicking and dragging on the graph is the best method.

The graphs auto re-size and fit to the window that you currently have open.

i think he means so you can compare runs?? run 1 vs run 2 ect

Ah, right on.

I didn't understand the question properly.

I will look into it, but I am not sure how that would be beneficial as the data would not be exact and hard to compare. But I can do a Load Graph 1 and Load Graph 2 button, then another button to toggle between the two.

It would all be still in a single window, but would save the hassle of loading the graphs each time you wanted to view the other one.

You got it .

I tried to do data logs when I update the tune or physical parts. Being able to compare them side by side would help me see the at say which RPM my Injector Duty Cycle increased, etc.

exaclty, see in nistune i usualy have to go back an load the log an look at it then load the other log and compare ect.. would be nice to atleast toggle between 2 logs to compare things..

another thing i like is when you datalog it records every single thing the ecu see's, speed, temp, rpm ect ect the list goes on but i mean it records everything.. it even displays the info on the consult gauges an you can play or scroll through the log an watch.. its really cool

im not sayin to copy nistune but im tryin to give you ideas .. know what i mean? lol