Originally Posted by
BenFenner Overboost protection using TP values instead of absolute pressure values is a bit tricky, which explains why they throw in the RPM component I believe. Frankly I'm probably not the person to ask when TP is involved as I'm not as I know enough about it to realize I don't know enough about it. =]
TP~K*Q/N where K is a constant, Q is MAF rate, and N is RPM. Load=TP/256
This relationship says that load increases when Q increases proportionately faster than RPM, such as when the throttle is opened, and as boost builds. I agree with you that correlating a calculated load to MAP is a bit tricky, which is one of the reasons I questioned the need (or usefulness) of this type of overboost protection. Not to say that it can't be done, and as you say, any protection is better than none. Worst case is that the overboost load table values get set too high and fail to protect. The scheme would require some manual correlation between boost pressure and load.
Originally Posted by
BenFenner Dave, I think you know what we need. We need to be able to set the overboost setting slightly above the boost pressure (or TP/rpm) we expect to see to provide that overboost protection but it needs to be able to be changed so that if we decide to run more boost we can with a simple parameter change.
Not a problem as this capability is already built into the stock code. Its just a matter of documenting and including the parameters in the XDF for TunerPro.
Originally Posted by
BenFenner As for how it should provide that protection (fuel cut, ignition retard/cut or a combination) I don't know if you can change that functionality, but if you can I'd expect it to work the same as the "safe" rev limiter however that's decided.
The protection method can be changed with some custom programming, (which is part of the value I'm trying to bring with TunerCode). Like you say, the "safe" method needs to be decided. Keep those ideas coming folks!
Cheers,
Dave