Originally Posted by
Kyle I really do not wish to hear another story from some other "source" in which none of us can really trust.
I tried to help you notify what that particular chassis NEEDS (and it is avoided by everyone). I understand it is no easy feat making a shortened or even better, a set of adjustable Upper Control Arms for that silly multi-link suspension, but these tie rods are not needed on a P10 or P11.....
I can make the car more responsive by simply replacing the current tie rods with new ones. I don't see how the steering radius is affected, either.
Non of these are source from another(s) or third world countries. Anyway, at first when i drove into production (6 months ago leas). We did have few OEM tie rods(a32/A33/P10/P11/B15/B14/B13) available to use them as samples so we could come out the tie rod kits for these vehicles. Among all of these chassis has been installed and got good feedbacks except p11. Yesterday, I just heard good thing from the owner yesterday, and it was a good feedbacks. I brought this up is very simple, I am just trying to show that the outcome came well.
The structure v.s. OEM tie rod are different. You can't compered spherical bushings v.s. OEM ball joint type and put them on the race track, the difference will be shown.
The result and the significant has been shown from the owner, and maybe it doesn't work on your end. But it doesn't mean won't work well on others' p11. I should have another sr20vet (off x-trail) p11 installed our kit soon.
Regarding to the upper arms that thing is pita, and to make them is not difficult. The demand v.s. supply is not there, and don't get me wrong. I am not saying I don't wanna make them, it just not too many people seem interested in.