Thread: Which gauge cluster do you like better, 91-92 or 93-94?

Don't invite the NX guys to this thread. They will be all... even the T-top chassis is stiffer than the SE-R and the Hardtop is soooo superior

I wanted a 93 because of the front bumper and tail-lights but I'm glad I bought the 92. More sporty on the inside and less sporty on the outside (sleeper). The front bumper on the 91-92's doesn't look sporty at all which I sometimes don't like. Nissan did a great job though. I still to this day, don't know why some magazines thought the b13 was ugly. I love the look.

Enough of my foolishness. Yes 91-92 gauges > 93-94 gauges

How could I forget about the clearly superior looking front end of the 93/94's? The homely 91/92 front bumper looks like it has an overbite. The 93/94 has such a handsome jawline.


Blasphemy. Those magazines should be burned as sacrilege.

Understated handsome classic good looks.

3-box sport sedan, eternally pleasing aesthetics and design were previously exhibited by the BMW 2002, E30, and the Datsun 510. To name a few.

I love the way a Classic looks. With or without the various USDM, MDM, and JDM factory options we have to tailor the body a bit to suit.

It seems everyone agrees..... 91-92 better interior, 93-94 better exterior. Everything besides the cluster can be swapped easily. I believe you would just need to convert the speed sensor to cable to swap it if I remember correctly but I am not 100 percent on that right now (major lack of sleep)

Agreed hence why my 92 Has a 94 Bumper, Headlights, Grill and 94 tails

I think a clean B13 looks as good as any car made back then.

Agreed. And WAY better than many....

1991-1992. That being said, I've always liked the NX1600's digital gauges. I prefer analog gauges, but the NX1600's were well done.

not just breaks, superior everything

stratton.

Anyone ever drive a GA16DE,SentraXE or something? No tachometer at all, even in manual! Instead the fuel and temp gauge take up the spot.