Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Product review: BPi Flow Stack

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 21-30 of 177
2008-04-15 05:46:36
#21
Originally Posted by Sentrixx
JWT FTL.

Just another reason why I'm tired of there overpriced working once crap.


edit. Nevermind.
2008-04-15 10:00:06
#22
Never said everything of there's is bad. But if you don't think that some things they are producing are over priced then by all means waste your money.

In this thread we are talking about flow stacks. UNIVERSAL flow stacks. Unlike JWT where you need there filter system and there maf adapter. That is not user friendly to anyone who would like to use there systems. Unlike JWT BPi's stacks are made for universal app that allow you to use any filter system with a 6" base. Which most company's that produce them do make. Company's like K&N, HKS, Cool Blue are all dyno proven. As well as BPi's flow stack which is dyno proven.

Name doesn't say everything.

Why buy a pair of $300 sunglasses from Channel when you can get better proven eye protection from Oakley for 1/3 the price?
2008-04-15 19:12:47
#23
Good point, I'm fairly dissapointed with the JWT one because now I need to get a MAF adapter if I want to put it on a CAI...

Where for cheaper you can get a BPi and MAF adapter and still have money left over
2008-04-16 15:16:05
#24
OR.... You can just extend the MAF to the lower part of the CAI like Miko did.
2008-04-16 22:19:56
#25
^^ That would work on a CAI. Now what about a WAI?
2008-04-16 22:24:55
#26
I dont have a MAF adapter on my Place Racing CAI(Its being used as a WAI right now) The JWT bolts up directly to the MAF and I dont need a MAF adapter to clamp it to my Intake
2008-06-22 20:54:23
#27
** Update **

Got it on FINALLY after a few months. I relocated my battery so I could fit it this on and make the whole set up look better.

I haven't dynoed the car yet but I do plan on doing it sometime soon. I would like to get my hands on a G20 OBD2 ECU. But as for the stack and filter combo.. I did notice a nice torque difference in the 4500+RPM range. really nice difference.

I will post up some dyno results once all is said and done.
2008-06-23 04:10:48
#28
Pics?
2008-06-23 10:28:34
#29
I will get some up later today
2008-06-23 11:33:52
#30
just out of curiousity.. how would this:


(not to scale. exaggerated for demostrational purposes)


work better than this:




pardon the drawing quality. it's 4:30AM and i can't sleep. just seems like the BPI stack wouldn't be as effective as a jwt/stillen one in regards to flow.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top