Alpha/N vs MAP and MAF anyone using it?
Anyone using Alpha/N as their load? I know its usually associated to ITB's but its seems like there's less stuff to adjust. Less things to adjust sounds like an easier tune to setup. I would assume the fuel map would take more fine tuning than a MAP setup but you don't use the IAT sensor.
MAP setup's over MAF: You need to setup the MAP and IAT sensors which you don't have to do on a MAF setup. Sounds like its harder to tune to me BUT once this is done there is less other things to adjust than a MAF setup right?
I'm trying to decide/debate on to go NEMU or not:
1. Huge cost
2. I'm N/A and not TURBO
3. No NITROUS
4. No FLEX FUEL in my area, so that's outta the question
5. Most of the extra things to adjust/goodies don't apply to me.
benefits I could use over basic tunercode:
1. 20x20 tables
2. I can finally integrate my wideband with the Breakout Box (I couldn't figure out the divide by 2 voltage divider thing)
3. Better launch control/anti lag/retard
4. MAF/MAP/Alpha/N
5. Realtime
I can do any MAF setup no problem, so I'm not sure if I want issues in tunning LOL
MAP setup's over MAF: You need to setup the MAP and IAT sensors which you don't have to do on a MAF setup. Sounds like its harder to tune to me BUT once this is done there is less other things to adjust than a MAF setup right?
I'm trying to decide/debate on to go NEMU or not:
1. Huge cost
2. I'm N/A and not TURBO
3. No NITROUS
4. No FLEX FUEL in my area, so that's outta the question
5. Most of the extra things to adjust/goodies don't apply to me.
benefits I could use over basic tunercode:
1. 20x20 tables
2. I can finally integrate my wideband with the Breakout Box (I couldn't figure out the divide by 2 voltage divider thing)
3. Better launch control/anti lag/retard
4. MAF/MAP/Alpha/N
5. Realtime
I can do any MAF setup no problem, so I'm not sure if I want issues in tunning LOL