Originally Posted by zer099
Here's my 2 cents from the swap that I noticed when I did this last year:
With the dual mass fly it leaves very little room between the fly surface and the back of the internal bellhousing.
As long as you fly+PP setup equals around 96mm you should be fine. I say this because my shaved fly+z33 PP setup is 96.63mm thick and with the stock spec V TB it works perfectly.
[img]http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j88/zer099-13/DSC03426.jpg[/IG]
I never measured how far the input shaft went into the clutch but it was pretty far in it, so I don't think that would be an issue.
For the record I am using a S15 dual mass fly that's shaved down 0.125 inches, a full z33 PP and clutch setup, Spec V throwout bearing, and the stock spacer plate (between tranny and engine).[/QUOTE]
Is the fly you have from JWT or some other company?
Also the z33 = vg30dett?[/img]
Here's my 2 cents from the swap that I noticed when I did this last year:
With the dual mass fly it leaves very little room between the fly surface and the back of the internal bellhousing.
As long as you fly+PP setup equals around 96mm you should be fine. I say this because my shaved fly+z33 PP setup is 96.63mm thick and with the stock spec V TB it works perfectly.
[img]http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j88/zer099-13/DSC03426.jpg[/IG]
I never measured how far the input shaft went into the clutch but it was pretty far in it, so I don't think that would be an issue.
For the record I am using a S15 dual mass fly that's shaved down 0.125 inches, a full z33 PP and clutch setup, Spec V throwout bearing, and the stock spacer plate (between tranny and engine).[/QUOTE]
Is the fly you have from JWT or some other company?
Also the z33 = vg30dett?[/img]