Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: Horsepower vs Torque Explanation

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 1-10 of 16
2011-11-15 16:55:47
#1
Horsepower vs Torque Explanation
Here is a great article that explains Horsepower vs Torque:
Horsepower vs. Torque at PRO Civic


Here are some exerts from the article:
Originally Posted by www.procivic.com

Deriving the Relationship

To be clear, torque is a force that causes something to rotate. That something is usually circular, but it doesn't have to be. The distance part of torque is also called a lever-arm (or moment arm). The lever-arm acts to multiply the force being exerted. Think of opening a door, if you try pushing near the hinge, it takes a lot more force than pushing form near the handle. The distance from where you push to the hinge is the length of the lever-arm. Again, don't confuse torque with work. Think of torque as an instantaneous push on the door, where as work would be pushing the door over a distance.

Horsepower is how quickly you can apply torque over a given distance. Watt's definition says that 1 hp = 550 ft-lb/s. Now, how do we convert horsepower into something that relates to torque and engine rpm? Well, keep in mind that horsepower is force times distance divided by time, and our distance is going to be in a circle (i.e. in revolutions)....



While talking to BenFenner he mentioned this example
Originally Posted by BenFenner

BenFenner: ...Torque can be though of as a puff of air pushing on the back of the car. Power is how many puffs of air you get per second...
....
BenFenner: Torque is the strength of the single puff of air.
BenFenner: Power is how many you get per second.
BenFenner: So having 1,000 ft lbs of torque from an electric engine at 0 rpm is like having a huge puff of air zero times a second. =/



Originally Posted by www.procivic.com

horsepower = torque * rpm / 5252

Now you know exactly how horsepower and torque are related. There are no exceptions to this rule; they will always be related by this formula. In fact, it might be better to see them as just flip sides of the same coin. One result of this formula is that below 5252 rpm, torque will always be more than horsepower, at 5252 rpm they will be equal, and above 5252 rpm torque will be less. Note that a dyno never measures horsepower; it can only measure torque and then use the above formula to get horsepower.


Originally Posted by www.procivic.com
Acceleration

So we now know that horsepower and torque are basically two different views of the same thing - change one and the other most also change. What we are really interested in is how they work together to affect a car's overall acceleration. Using Newton's Second Law, we know that F = ma.

....

So, our acceleration at any given moment is only dependent on the torque at the wheels (again, assuming that traction is not broken). That means the acceleration of the car is constantly changing to match the torque curve, and the car accelerates hardest at the torque peak. The name of the game is to keep your car producing as much torque as possible, for the longest amount of time possible. That will give you the best acceleration and fastest quarter mile times.




Now to stray away a little, this is why we dyno in 1:1 gears (Meaning the transmission is not multiplying torque). As mentioned earlier a dyno doesn't measure Horsepower, it measures torque then converts it into a Horsepower number. If you were to dyno in a non 1:1 gear, aka lower gear, then torque numbers would be higher, thus a dyno would see higher HP numbers, when in reality your HP would still be the same.

Originally Posted by www.procivic.com

The Transmission Effect
Now comes the tricky part: the transmission. The fact that our engines cannot rev indefinitely means we must have transmissions to allow our wheels to keep spinning faster while keeping the revs under redline. A transmission essentially makes engine torque meaningless because it can multiple your flywheel torque to any amount it pleases, and is only limited by physical gear size. This is because gears can be arranged to increase or decrease their lever-arms and thus change the final torque output.

However, don't go out and buy yourself a giant gear set just yet: transmissions cannot amplify horsepower. This would violate the law of conservation of energy and change the world as we know it. Instead, as we increase the torque output for a certain gear, we decrease the maximum speed that we can have in that gear. Would you want your Honda Civic to have 400 lb-ft of torque in 1st gear but only be able to go 8 mph in that gear? Probably not. The opposite is also true; as you decrease the torque output of a certain gear, you increase maximum speed, assuming you can reach it. That is the main reason why you accelerate slower in higher gears.



Originally Posted by www.procivic.com
The Verdict

So what advantage does a higher horsepower engine have compared to a lower one, assuming they both have similar torque curves? In short, the higher horsepower one will perform much better. The car with the high-reving, high-horsepower engine can run a more aggressive set of gears while still being able to spend the same amount of time in each gear as the slower car. This will give it better overall acceleration because of increased torque to the wheels. If both cars run the same gears, then the high-power one will be able to spend a shorter time in each gear, giving it better overall acceleration. Either way, it is an advantage. If you take away anything from this article, let it be that gearing is extremely important in determining a car's overall performance.



Taking advantage of horsepower, don't cut yourself short by shifting at peak torque. Even shifting at peak Horsepower might not be a good idea. Check your car's dynograph, if your power is not falling off majorly after peak Horsepower, take the car to redline!
Originally Posted by www.procivic.com
As far as shifting goes, always shift to maximize transmission output torque. It turns out this is exactly the same as saying shift to maximize engine power. Never shift at torque peak, even if your best friend tells you he swears it's faster that way. You will lose the overall higher torque of the current gear and it will also put you in a worse spot in the next gear. Most cars (Honda Civics included) will obtain their best quarter mile times by shifting at redline, but it is not true for every car. For some cars, it is necessary to look at a dyno graph to really see where the best point is.



While this is true, keep in mind this applies mostly for racing. If you daily drive or tow, having more torque helps tremendously because it's low end horsepower!
Originally Posted by www.procivic.com
And that's it. Now if someone claims your Honda Civic can't go fast because it doesn't have enough torque, you can prove them wrong!
Last edited by Vadim on 2011-11-15 at 19-37-01.
2011-11-15 17:17:04
#2
nice write up
2011-11-15 17:38:59
#3
Very well explained.
2011-11-15 18:47:15
#4
Very nice, wanting more.
2011-11-15 19:16:10
#5
Alright added some more bits from that article. From all of the articles that I've read through, this one was the most level minded with no muscle car bias.
2011-11-15 19:35:42
#6
I tried hashing this all out back in 2008 but I wasn't able to get through to people.
http://www.sr20-forum.com/99364-post57.html
http://www.sr20-forum.com/165553-post44.html
http://www.sr20-forum.com/drag-strip/21143-battle-hp-torque.html

Snickers and I also had an educational session a while ago on G20.net on the subject.
Last edited by BenFenner on 2012-02-27 at 16-14-29.
2011-11-15 21:20:30
#7
Interesting reading all around. Ben, your discussion with Snickers was most entertaining and enlightening at the same time. I have said it many times before and it is most certainly applicable, in regards to that discussion as well, that most times (although not always) when 2 rational and/or intelligent people are debating a point, often times the 2 parties to the discussion have a similar point of view but are looking at the discussion from different angles. Most times in any problematic discussion people are too pig-headed to see the discussion from the other point of view. When they do, however, they usually see that some of the points being argued are in fact the same or atleast similar in theory and principle.

When I was a wee bit younger and I used to drive my RR B15 in a "spirited" manner I would almost always outrun Hondas, Toyotas, Acuras, etc. Everyone use to say that my four-door grocery getter was slow until we lined up of course. The reason? I had a lot more "early horsepower" and generally better gearing as well. These jaunts were, as just described, short runs, which is why I would always win. Ofcourse when I lined up against a a DX civic with a B18 swap and a 9000 RPM redline things were different. I had him for quite a while but then something happened, his higher horsepower kicked in at his upper RPM range and he started to pull on me. At that speed my low-down torque was irrelevant because he could get his horsepower to his wheels quicker than I could mine, plus, he just had more overall HP than I did!

Having said this, I must admit that I would have to read up more on the science behind such a discussion in order to have a more informed opinion.

When I was asked in the past how to describe the HP vs. TQ equation I would always state that I believed TQ was a measure of how quickly you could get the horsepower to the wheels, with the total HP being the key between two competeing vehicles, provided that all of the other variables between them were the same. So, in theory low down torque or early horsepower is a measure of how quickly I can get to making my horsepower in a quicker manner, ie. my top end. Regardless of the variables of torque and transmission and weight and resistance, horsepower is the same in any gear at a given RPM and changing those variables will help or hinder the ability of your vehicle to ged to its fastest horsepower target zone! Having said that, I understand why early horsepower, atleast IMHO, could be understood better than torque or lbs-ft. Have I made a mess of this? Does this sound right?

BTW, the most enlightening part of the G20 discussion was that a certain somebody has a sex tape! Just what type of people are frequenting this forum is my next question!?!

I am glad this was posted! Like to see more of these discussions for sure!!!
Last edited by B15NEOVVL on 2011-11-15 at 22-31-47. Reason: Grammar!! :)
2011-11-15 22:26:32
#8
Originally Posted by BenFenner
I tried hashing this all out back in 2008 but I wasn't able to get through to people.
http://www.sr20-forum.com/99364-post57.html
http://www.sr20-forum.com/165553-post44.html

Snickers and I also had an educational session a while ago on G20.net on the subject.


^Holy horsepowers batman! O_o. That link between you and snickers is classic as h*ll.
2011-12-01 00:06:29
#9
To solidify four years of my own millings on the topic...

I use engine torque to determine these things:
  • How much stress am I putting on the drivetrain at any given rpm?
  • How much injector pulse-width will I need at any given rpm?
  • How efficient is a single combustion event at any given rpm?
  • How much power will I make at any given rpm?

I use engine power to determine these things:
  • Engine/car acceleration at all rpm.
  • Fueling needs (required system flow) at all rpm.
  • Induction needs at all rpm.
  • Exhaustion needs at all rpm.
Last edited by BenFenner on 2011-12-01 at 00-10-12.
2011-12-01 01:00:07
#10
Very nice, your threads are gold. This will come on handy when I need to show some friends that horsepower isnt everything
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top