Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: B13, B14, B15 Suspension Information...

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 61-70 of 162
2010-06-27 17:02:22
#61
But does the ST rear bar fit the front OEM housings?
2010-06-27 17:03:16
#62
i'm not sure about that, I've never messed with the ST bar because it was thinner and not adjustable..
2010-06-27 20:56:13
#63
well I had been all about the Progress bar for both it's adjustability and it's thickness over the ST bar.. but it DID dial in a TON of oversteer, and I think I found a solution:

FS: Upgraded Suspension Techniques B13 Rear Bar - SR20 Forum
2010-07-22 00:09:37
#64
B13 Rear Spring attaching OE part number list.

My question is, what parts are "mandatory" to replace when you swap out springs?

I have this terrible sound, like a clunking from my rear suspension, but all bolts are tight, the sway bar is secure.. seems like the bearing/spacer. 08912-7421A or perhaps 08915-4421A...
2010-07-22 02:47:35
#65
Originally Posted by BenFenner
With a bump-steer correction kit and sufficiently shortened struts the last thing you have to really worry about when lowering the car to a good degree (geometry-wise) is the angle of the CV joint. The more severe the angle, the lower the lifespan of the CV joint. I believe 15 degrees at rest is a rough estimate of max acceptable angle for long life. Anything beyond that you're going beyond what the CV joint is rated for.


Would that degree only be achieved with the shortened struts and bumpsteer kits? Or is it possible that most of us are fairly close to that degree?

I had never considered the CV joints before. But I guess that is something encountered when you have to do MORE!
2010-08-03 19:54:51
#66
Shawn,

Here is some Hyperco B14 info.

Hyperco B14 Spring Deal - IT'S ON!!!! - SR20 Forum

Front - 300 lb/in rate with 1" drop
Rear - 250 lb/in rate with 5/8" drop
2010-09-27 15:37:52
#67
Found what I needed threw a small search, thanx Shawn B
2010-09-27 16:05:39
#68
Originally Posted by Nismo_34
Would that degree only be achieved with the shortened struts and bumpsteer kits? Or is it possible that most of us are fairly close to that degree?
Stock cars usually have close to 0 deree angles on the CV joints at rest. As you lower the car with shorter springs (shortened struts and bumpsteer kits have little-to-nothing to do with it) the CV joints will experience more angle at rest. Lowering too much can be an issue. I don't think anyone is really going that low with our cars though.

This angle can be corrected with a higher mount for the lower ball joint. I believe OEM is building that into their custom front control arms.

I forgot to mention the other issue with going low. The roll center changes usually for the worse. This too is corrected with a raised mount for the lower ball joint.
2010-10-02 03:56:41
#69
where do you buy your koni yellows??

I went to Summit racing and they had koni yellows listed for B15's as if there was no difference between Spec V housing/insert compared to an LE B15..

I always thought you HAD to specify B15 Spec V yellow insert to get the right ones.. ugh I can't believe how many write ups there are on this and how unclear it still is.
2010-10-02 05:02:58
#70
Originally Posted by RobSE
Mike Kojima at his best:
Source:
Project Nissan Sentra Spec-V part 5; Lessons in Geometry


Not to disparage the kits offered or anything like that, but you need to keep context in mind and exactly which Sentra we are talking about here. Read the article. It's about a B15 being converted solely for track use with a lot of drop - 3" to 4". IDK but pretty sure 4" exceeds the entire front travel of the B13, possibly even in stock trim with it's rally-like ride height and soft springs with Mac Struts.

I run OEM ends and I don't have this problem with the B13, and believe me, I know bump steer when I feel it. I've tracked the car heavily and it's a dual use car(i.e. street legal) like many B13 owners probably have who care about this stuff. I have no need or desire to swap out the OEM parts in this area. Why not? My car does not even come close to the extreme angles pictured - it looks nearly level at rest.

Why?

a) My B13's is not dropped 4", or even 3", read the article and the intended use of that project car - pure track car. Most of us are driving street cars, possibly dual-use street/track like myself. If you're dropping a Sentra 4" on the street then it's going to be for style points, and you are going to have a lot of challenges if you expect it to handle under hard use in a variety of situations. If not, this really doesn't apply to your car.

Originally Posted by MikeK
Since we are lowering the car a large amount 3-4”, we need to address these issues if we expect the car to handle well under the hardcore use we expect it to see.


b) is not a B14, or...

Originally Posted by MikeK
The car was cursed with a crude beam axle rear suspension and a McPherson strut front suspension whose geometry was designed around efficient packaging and relentless understeer rather than performance. Because of this, the Sentra is at a significant disadvantage in the handling department when compared to its FWD rivals, mainly Hondas, the Scion TC and even the Infiniti G20.


The G20 has no better front suspension than the B13. In my car, w/ the swap to Progress coilovers, GC plates, etc., it's better than any stock G20 or (shudder) Scion/Camry TC. Read the article carefully, too, he couldn't raise the top mounts with GC plates, an essential step in the B13 if expect to have decent travel AND stay off the bump stops w/o resorting to some pretty high spring rates.

c) ...is also not a B15. This also adds some important context:

Originally Posted by MikeK
It seems like the B15 Sentra SE-R Spec-V just doesn’t get any respect. Unlike previous models of SE-R powered by the SR20DE engine who’s owners seem to love them and drive them until their shells decay into loose piles of metallic oxides, the owners of the new generation of SE-R seem to be eager to get rid of them, trading them in for the WRX, EVO, Si or SRT as soon as their incomes grow enough to afford the payments of these more expensive cars.


There's probably a good reason for that. Stack up what went into their B15 project car in $$$ to cure its inherently hard-to-lower front geometry, issues with rear beam geometry, flex, etc and it's well over $5k-$7k, easily. That's a lot of money compared to what that buys upgrading a B13 (about double the cost of my entire suspension). Or a Honda. Sure, you have a stiffer chassis, and if you're building a race car, the B13's age is an instant disqualifier today in many series. It's simply too old for what the rules allow. But I'd have to really love the B15 to dump the kind of coin into the car that they did (or would have to, if paying anything close to market value for their parts). For a pure RACE car, I'd buy a Honda or even (shudder) a Scion TC (read their article on their project Scion TC and you'll see why) before going the route they did. I'll eat my words if it starts owning Hondas in its class (don't hold your breath on that one).

Unless you are slamming your B13, I don't see the need for a bump steer kit, if you are also using a setup like the GC plates and height-independent adjustable CO's (changing the CO height is independent of the body size, within its range). Maybe if you are keeping a Mac Strut layout, and trying to run with both 2-3" of travel with spring rates less than about 300 lbs/in, also w/o top mount changes, then yes, I'd consider it.

But I'd make every single one of those other changes before - GC plates, CO's, etc. After which, unless I run some really stupid caster settings, I don't expect bump steer (and don't have it).
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top