Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: How to build a 300 WHP/Liter SR (on the cheap?) discussion.

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 177
2008-09-10 19:28:39
#31
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
im not saying they are or arent capable, but there are other much stronger much better rods out there, also much lighter depending on the brand,type,style... a real good build i dont think consist of stock rods..i dont think stock rods can compete with chromoly,titanium, ect that other rods are made of.


ok understood
2008-09-10 20:18:27
#32
Originally Posted by BenFenner
Hit us with links.

Because of superior head flow?

I'll get to that stage when I have to. For now I'd love to pick the brains of the forum members.


http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/0806_turp_project_low_buck_sr20de/index.html

http://www.turbomagazine.com/tech/turp_0807_project_low_buck_sr20de_part_2/index.html

I hope to see his VE one day as well. One of my favorite automotive writers.

The VE head flows better to begin with yes. You have to throw a lot of loot into a DE head to make it comparable and at that point you are going to ask yourself "Why didn't I just get a VE and have a mild port?"

If you are gonna do the bottom end anyway you'll also want the better VE oil pump.

Like they said 20V or VET would be ideal but these motors are rare and cost lots more. Worth it imo.
2008-09-10 20:24:19
#33
Originally Posted by Andreas
I am correcting you.

Rods in order of strength.

DE rods

DET rods

GTIR DET rods.

The rods thickness can be seen just by placing them next to each other.

GTIR rods are some big bad mothers. I would not attempt to go 600 WHP with DE or DET rods for any long period of time. Reving a GTIR really high is not something I would do either as they are some what heavy.


I would run Crower, Saenz, Pauter, or Carrillo rods for a 600 WHP plus build.


i stand corrected.
2008-09-10 21:00:17
#34
Originally Posted by BenFenner
I think this is a given. 10.0:1 sounds much too aggressive. Remember this is pump gasoline. I was thinking 8.5:1 (stock DET) and I'm not sure why you'd up the compression at all given the goals.


well i think more compression could yeild you in better turbo response, ie: if you have higher compression and bigger AR your response might not be as laggy as say a larger AR and lower compression, thats the only reason i could see upping the compression some is if your turbo AR is going to be in the larger range that it might become laggy....i definitly think a responcy 600whp application would be nice..definitly having a wide range powerband would be nice, instead of the normal higher RPM spool small powerband high whp applicaions you always see people build...i definitly would rather take a smaller whp application ie:400whp but a wide range of power, verses a 600whp short powerband app but that just might be me
2008-09-10 21:05:39
#35
To summarize it seems a good choice for the task would be to start with a typical SR20VE block and head due to superior oil pump and high head flow. Light, forged piston rods are on the menu. Compression ratio of 8.5:1 to 9.0:1 viable options.

How about pistons? Light, forged pistons a no brainer at this point? Also I still don't think boring out the block is necessary, but could be a good idea if sleeving the block is deemed mandatory (as a "while you're in there" sort of thing). How do we stand on pistons, sleeves and bore size? Is piston slap a thing of the past with forged pistons?

I'm sure the same theory with the piston rods applies here. With the revs we're looking for here it would be prudent to go lighter than stock cast for the pistons. Is it worth the cost and possible downsides?
2008-09-10 21:06:31
#36
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
well i think more compression could yeild you in better turbo response, ie: if you have higher compression and bigger AR your response might not be as laggy as say a larger AR and lower compression, thats the only reason i could see upping the compression some is if your turbo AR is going to be in the larger range that it might become laggy....i definitly think a responcy 600whp application would be nice..definitly having a wide range powerband would be nice, instead of the normal higher RPM spool small powerband high whp applicaions you always see people build...i definitly would rather take a smaller whp application ie:400whp but a wide range of power, verses a 600whp short powerband app but that just might be me


That's pretty much the way I think too, peak numbers can suck it, I'm wanting to see where the power is in the RPM range, and what the power around that number is like.

10:1 on a larger turbo like I would run in said build would probably yield 600whp across a much broader range than 3-400rpms near redline.

Also, my vdub is running 10:1 compression, and hopefully soon I'll be pushing ~10psi through it... should be fun. 8v heads don't flow at all though
2008-09-10 21:09:00
#37
Originally Posted by GT2871RBLUBIRD
i definitly would rather take a smaller whp application ie:400whp but a wide range of power, verses a 600whp short powerband app but that just might be me
I'm with you 100% there. The idea here really is a dyno queen. I know that sounds bad but don't let it get to you too much. =]
2008-09-10 21:20:59
#38
Thanks to Mazworx and companies like CP there are a lot of good options for pistons out there these days.
2008-09-10 22:13:41
#39
Such great info there. So hard to resist doing anything and everything to make an engine great. You can make it as deep of a money pit as you want. =]
2008-09-10 22:44:12
#40
I would prefer to see a man like Charles Dundan write an article on SR20VE and VET motors. I think I could do a great job myself.

Sometimes the best people dont have an outlet to write articles where other can read it.
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top