Welcome to the SR20 Community Forum - The Dash.
Register
SR20 forum logo

Thread: so, how balanced are SR20's?

+ Reply To Thread
Posts: 31-40 of 66
2008-04-27 16:43:16
#31
Originally Posted by BenFenner
I'll field this question. The answer: "the owners". They either forget to change the oil (leave non-synthetic in over 20k miles), let the oil level get dangerously low (usually due to oil leak), or they rev the crap out of a cold motor. All of these things will result in accelerated rod bearing failure. When you get oil to the bearings they are fine. Do something to prevent proper lubrication and you have trouble.

I guess it would be stupid to assume Honda drivers are more diligent than SR20 drivers when it comes to proper lubrication. This makes me think Honda's general engine lubrication design is probably a step above what the SR20 has. Maybe their oil pick-up and scavenging is better, maybe their oil pressure operation is more stable under cold temps, etc.

When treated properly, the SR20 is as reliable. Maybe it doesn't take abuse as gracefully as a Honda motor.


Maybe Honduh owners generally don't have the balls to rev as much, and as high, as SR owners.
2008-04-27 16:55:58
#32
type r's from honda, including ctr and itr motors i believe were ported and balanced from the factory.

stratton.
2008-04-27 20:01:05
#33
Originally Posted by DMSentra
Maybe Honduh owners generally don't have the balls to rev as much, and as high, as SR owners.



dude, comments like these get played out real quick....think of something original, at least
Teal97, thanks for the confirmation on the VE. It seems like the VE's might have gotten the same treatment from the factory Stratton mentioned about the Type R's(ported/polished head, balnced crankshaft)? I also know the tolerances on the Type R's are very tight as everything was manually done and hand made.
Guys, I know you're trying to think of other ways (timing chain, closed deck, etc..) the SR is better than Hondas motors, but this was a specific question from the start about a completely different topic.
2008-04-27 21:08:01
#34
Originally Posted by revhappy
Guys, I know you're trying to think of other ways (timing chain, closed deck, etc..) the SR is better than Hondas motors, but this was a specific question from the start about a completely different topic.


Seriously. It makes our forum sound like a bunch of blind, SR20 fanboys. Where's the maturity?
2008-04-27 22:07:28
#35
Originally Posted by revhappy
dude, comments like these get played out real quick....think of something original, at least
Teal97, thanks for the confirmation on the VE. It seems like the VE's might have gotten the same treatment from the factory Stratton mentioned about the Type R's(ported/polished head, balnced crankshaft)? I also know the tolerances on the Type R's are very tight as everything was manually done and hand made.
Guys, I know you're trying to think of other ways (timing chain, closed deck, etc..) the SR is better than Hondas motors, but this was a specific question from the start about a completely different topic.


Yeah, like this forum is the pinnacle of maturity!
2008-04-27 22:49:54
#36
sure it is
2008-04-27 23:33:56
#37
Yea but sometimes it gets a little rediclous on the forum as we all know ( as well as our old one.. ) Sometimes the people on here need to lighten up, relax, and quit crying. Give our new guys a little better welcoming when asking the wrong thing.


Chris
2008-04-27 23:46:34
#38
I used to be under the impression that belt driven cars rev smoother than chain. After driving a new civic si with i/h/e and hondata it was super smooth all the way to 9. It must be the tighter clearances from factory and blueprinting the higher rev engines that gives that graceful feeling.
2008-04-27 23:58:44
#39
i dont really feel that a belt verse chain driven is going to be more smooth

the downside to belt drven powertrains that rev high, is they stretch out,snap,and can jump teeth which obviously is really bad
2008-04-28 00:30:27
#40
It is most definitely an interesting point about the belt vs chain. And the fact that both company's have used different methods doesn't really prove anything. I would assume the belt would help to dampen allot of vibration and noise in between the crank and the valve train. Might help to keep both ends operating smoother. However I also bet the belt would stretch at high rpm. I wonder how much it would stretch?

I have never driven a Honda at length, but i honestly don't notice much difference from my ve to my buddies ls and gsr motors..they all seem fairly equal.

Both of the brands have a wide verity of fan base. GIVE it a rest people, its really not funny anymore. I know plenty of sr20 owners who know NOTHING about what they are doing. I also know tons of Honda owners who pay more attention to detail then I do...

Dudeman

Dudeman
+ Reply To Thread
  • [Type to search users.]
  • Quick Reply
    Thread Information
    There are currently ? users browsing this thread. (? members & ? guests)
    StubUserName

    Back to top